Hi All
I have a feeling this a very naive question...
The first chords nearly all books / resources tell you to learn are the "standard" major and minor chords. For example those here
https://www.guitarhabits.com/the-8-most-important-open-guitar-chords-for-beginners/.
Why is it therefore, that the "standard" E major (top one here
http://www.guitar-chords.org.uk/e-major-chord.html) sounds lower than the standard C major (top one here
http://www.guitar-chords.org.uk/c-major-chord.html) when E is above C on a scale / in a given octave.
Is because the "standard E" chord's root is in an octave lower than that of the standard "C" root?
If so, why are beginners told to learn these chords? Would not make more sense to learn chord shapes that make a sound that increases and decreases in pitch as you move from A-->F and F-->A respectively (like hitting the white keys on a piano sequentially would). Wouldn't that allow you to recreate tunes more easily? For example, and ignoring chord progression rules etc:
If on a piano I made a tune that went C-->D-->E-->D-->C, the sound would go up then down. The same would be true if I played key triads with those notes as roots.
If I did the same using standard chords on a guitar it would go up from C to D but then down from D to E.
Or am I missing something?
Best wishes,
Dave
Comments
At first it's more a case of getting used to 'grips' or forms, certain chord shapes. If you want that pitch progression then you need different positions. Like for the E-C you could use the C-shape with the root on the 7th fret A string for the E chord, then the open C. Or the barred shape (the open A shape), descending E to C.
The roots of those two in the links: the C shape root is on the A string 3rd fret. The E shape root is the low open E string, a minor sixth lower down. The open E has the low E string plus a B note, both lower in pitch than the C shape's root. Hence sounding lower/fuller.
Side note, in those shapes the C chord has the root appearing twice (A string, B string), and the E chord has it three times (the two open Es and on the D string). The root isn't necessarily the lowest note played.
E is the easiest major chord that uses all strings (and means beginners don't have to worry about only playing certain strings).
A is the next easiest, and if a beginner does happen to catch the bottom string, it's not the end of the world, as E is still part of an A chord.
Then you have D. You ideally don't want to hit the bottom string for that, but you can get away with catching the next string, as A is part of the D major chord.
A,D&E, are relatively easy chord changes. You can use an anchor finger while changing, so ideal for beginners, and with just those 3 chords, you can play quite a few songs.
When you move onto C and G, they involve more finger movements, so are used as the next logical step to improving finger movement.
Then you add in the easy minor chords, Em, and Am, and then just to complete all the possible easy/open major and minor chords, you throw in the Dm (which to this day still takes me far more thought than I'd like to admit to play quickly!).
Once you've learnt those chords, you're into rarely used open chords (Gm), and chords that require 4 fingers or use of the pinky, which is a struggle for lots of beginners.
Similarly on guitar you learn established shapes that make sense moving from one to another. As you become more experienced you can make different choices.
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
I just like keeping things simple, get your hand on the thing and play. I don't do theory at the beginning with new learners.
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
The first song I usually give them is Knockin' On Heaven' Door, only 4 chords in total!
occurs to me newbies would be better off taught to play simple phrases on a single string, then the same on a different string at same pitch, then same tune across 2strimgs, then 3 strings
then teach them double stops and three string chords (esp power chords) on top 3 and bottom 3 strings
get them doing that and you’ll have them able to play songs early on without any duff changes, difficulty in remembering where every finger goes etc
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
Most can at least hold down like Em or the bottom 3 strings of a G chord to get things going. As we progress they start adding more fingers to the shapes.
Having said that strangely most of the learners I get have already been playing for a few years, just rubbish at changing chords and staying in time with any music.
I now arrange a lot of songs with a capo so they still use said shapes up and down the neck. Others would perhaps work better with single string melodies but normally it'd involve reading guitar tab if crossing strings, something they don't do very well (e.g they treat the bottom line as the thinnest thing and the top line as the thickest when it should be the other way round!)
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
But yes you're right, logically it doesn't make sense to see the top line as the bottom string, if you view the guitar strings with the guitar sat on your lap facing up its the same, the low e string will be nearer to your chest.
Only if you use the same chord inversion for every one of those triads in the progression.
Music gets more interesting when you choose something other than the nominal root note of a given chord to be the lowest note that your instrument is sounding.
As a simple example, fingerpick the A Minor chord on the lowest two frets. First, use the open A string as the lowest note. Then, try C at the third fret of the A string under the same Am chord shape ... or B ... or G on the wound E string ... or F#.
* Sorry to be pedantic about technical terms but you will need to get a grasp of these in order to discuss musical ideas with other people.