Hi all
Hope people like
@monquixote may be able to offer any help here.
I've indefinitely bailed on the guitar for now as it's definitely past the point of boring habit.
I'm not much of a singer, I can hear perfectly well and can pitch pretty well if a little lacking in strength and confidence, from years of classical piano you have to have an ear and at least relative mental pitch to get you through exams. But my tone isn't great, breathing isn't either but it used to be when I was in the college chamber choir so I know that can be improve.
With lessons...how much do they try to change things?
Hard to fully convey what I mean by this, but say like when I've had guitar lessons (and gave them up quickly) it was all about "no ignore your own way of playing This is the right way to play because that's what they teach you to pass your exams in it". And however much you say you want to play your own way just with improved technique, they'll make you sound like every other guitar pupil? I had that for years with piano, but now when I occasionally play what I've lost in technique, I make up for with my own style, and my own feel for it. And I get much better comments about it than I did before.
So what I'm asking, is how much would their teaching change my ability to be individual with it? Does this make sense? With guitar my greatest fear (and indeed one reason I've given it up) is sounding like a Clapton type, in my eyes generic and safe - I'd like to be able to do stuff wrong if it sounds better
As a reference, singers I might like to use as an influence would be Jim Morrison (for dynamics), Jack White (for attack and attitude), Julian Casablancas, Lou Reed, both for the less clear vocals and phrasing
Thanks peoples
Comments
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic