Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Google

Become a Subscriber!

Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!

Read more...

Update: My drummer speeds up during every song. Found an App!

What's Hot
135

Comments

  • ICBMICBM Frets: 71960
    This is exactly like the argument between old-school 'guitar volume control only' players and modern 'tap dancing pedalboard' players - each thinks the other is lazy and shows a lack of musicianship or willingness to learn how to do something properly.

    Which is not true. Each requires a different set of learning and skills, but neither is inherently skilful or lazy, or better or worse musicianship - they're just different approaches with different opportunities and different limitations.

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 4reaction image Wisdom
  • LastMantraLastMantra Frets: 3822
    I think it's more complicated than just "clicks are good" or "clicks are bad".  They're absolutely necessary for the sort of shows that U2 or Coldplay or Muse do - it would be fucked if they weren't in time with the light show.  Equally there's no click behind Back in Black, or Nevermind, or Revolver, or Exile on Main Street etc etc, and the timing on all of those is really fluid and they're all fantastic records that would almost certainly be worse if put on rigid tempo.

    I'm quite sure that practising with a click is a good thing for drummers - I'm starting to do this myself - but for recording and live it's not a case of "click tracks absolutely make music better". Clearly they'll make the timing more accurate to a predefined bpm, but they also remove an element of flow and connection between players. Sometimes that's a good thing, sometimes not. 
    There was a documentary about the making of Nevermind where Dave Grohl said he was asked to play to a click for one of the songs (can't remember which one). Says he was pretty pissd off but did it anyway and was happy after.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • stickyfiddlestickyfiddle Frets: 26753
    I think it's more complicated than just "clicks are good" or "clicks are bad".  They're absolutely necessary for the sort of shows that U2 or Coldplay or Muse do - it would be fucked if they weren't in time with the light show.  Equally there's no click behind Back in Black, or Nevermind, or Revolver, or Exile on Main Street etc etc, and the timing on all of those is really fluid and they're all fantastic records that would almost certainly be worse if put on rigid tempo.

    I'm quite sure that practising with a click is a good thing for drummers - I'm starting to do this myself - but for recording and live it's not a case of "click tracks absolutely make music better". Clearly they'll make the timing more accurate to a predefined bpm, but they also remove an element of flow and connection between players. Sometimes that's a good thing, sometimes not. 
    There was a documentary about the making of Nevermind where Dave Grohl said he was asked to play to a click for one of the songs (can't remember which one). Says he was pretty pissd off but did it anyway and was happy after.
    The intro to Lithium, apparently - http://www.burntout.com/nirvana/articles/article5.html
    The Assumptions - UAE party band for all your rock & soul desires
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • lukedlb said:
    This quantized john bonham video neatly shows the dangers of too strict a time keeping. Sort of rock vs disco analogy:
    https://youtu.be/hT4fFolyZYU
    That video shows the dangers of too strict an editing job. Not too strict a time keeping. I've got tracks played to a click, and if I mute the click the drummer has humanity to his playing in spades. If I go through and edit every single hit on the kick, snare, and toms, then yes... it's going to be robbed of the natural quality of his playing.

    Two different things are being discussed here. I'm of the opinion that a musicians inner-clock should be trained very highly, not just left to be pseudo-random.

    Bye!

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 3reaction image Wisdom
  • Creed_ClicksCreed_Clicks Frets: 1385
    Timing. You either have it or you don't.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • koneguitaristkoneguitarist Frets: 4125
    Believe me when I say I have played with some bad drummers, seriously try playing crazy little thing called love, starting off with a swing but straight after 30 seconds or so! 
    I used a drum Machine in a 4 pc band for about 5 years and loved it for its simplicity, lack of volume on stage and playing so many styles it was brilliant, but it depends on the music that I am playing, some of my vids on YT start off slower than they finish, is it a bad thing? Technically yes. did it feel good on the night and did audience enjoy it yes. 
    The point I am making is, speeding up a bit or slowing down a bit is not a huge sin in my book if whole performance is good. What I will not accept is drastic changes of tempo, like after a fill for instance, that is often down to poor technique by drummer. The speed/Tempo is not always the drummers fault, but can add to a performance from an audience point of view. 
    Nothing wrong in my book by using a click track as long as its for right reasons. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • koneguitaristkoneguitarist Frets: 4125
    youtu.be/TowCiqVQMmw

    first track Burning love is my last gig, tempo fairly even throughout, showing drummer can keep time. 
    2nd song Call me the Breeze, starts off slow, but by listening to beginning and jumping forward to end of song tempo changes a lot? whose fault?

    youtu.be/EM-7m6XZdcw
     

    0reaction image LOL 1reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • TheBigDipperTheBigDipper Frets: 4722
    youtu.be/TowCiqVQMmw

    first track Burning love is my last gig, tempo fairly even throughout, showing drummer can keep time. 
    2nd song Call me the Breeze, starts off slow, but by listening to beginning and jumping forward to end of song tempo changes a lot? whose fault?

    youtu.be/EM-7m6XZdcw
     

    Only listened to the start of the keys solo. The singer seems to have a tempo that makes musical sense on a casual first listen, so I'd suggest the rest listen to him and follow it. He’ll be the one the audience is listening to. The drummer does seem to be pushing, but he might be playing at the right tempo and the singer is dragging the band.

    Good luck when you play that to the whole band! The question for me is what is the tempo you've agreed on. And do people practice their parts at that tempo? 

    From memory, JJ recorded it a bit faster than you're playing it, but I like the slower tempo, myself. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • JalapenoJalapeno Frets: 6378
    edited May 2019
    Call Me The Breeze is great stuff !!!!

    However, JJ Cale's playing and his band's style is best described as loose - not a good topic for this thread really. Probably only thing looser would be John Lee Hooker and 13 & 1/4 bar blues approach ;)
    Imagine something sharp and witty here ......

    Feedback
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • FunkfingersFunkfingers Frets: 14323
    edited May 2019
    Everyone in the band should be following the drummer. The drummer should be the master clock. IMHO.
    This would not work for The Who. 

    Townshend ruled the timing. Entwistle noodled away in the low register. Moon did the flash, twiddly nonsense on top.




    It is possible for a drummer to define the timing without actually playing it in the strict sense.

    Vinnie Colaiuta has a floaty feel which sometimes leaves you wondering whether the music has a compound time signature or is swinging broadly in 4/4. Neil Peart also does this - especially after his involvement with the Buddy Rich Orchestra tribute project. There are some Rush compositions for which Alex and Geddy are riffing in a compound, shifting time signature. Neil did the counting and realised that he could sail through all that in 4/4 and still land on the one when the composition returned to 4/4.
    Be seeing you.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • JalapenoJalapeno Frets: 6378
    Everyone in the band should be following the drummer. The drummer should be the master clock. IMHO.
    This would not work for The Who. 

    Nor Fleetwood Mac
    Imagine something sharp and witty here ......

    Feedback
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • There are some Rush compositions for which Alex and Geddy are riffing in a compound, shifting time signature. Neil did the counting and realised that he could sail through all that in 4/4 and still land on the one when the composition returned to 4/4.
    That's a simple poly-rhythmic case. The underlying pulse is still pretty much the same on all instruments, regardless of time signatures.

    There is a thing called a "predominant local pulse" which is essentially a measure of the tatum of a piece of audio - the driving pulse you could think of it as, which is usually a 4th, 8th, 16th, or 32nd. This occurs in all rhythmic music and is what our ears tune into in order to clap along. It's a concept that comes from Music Information Retrieval, and is modelled on how the human brain perceives rhythm.

    When you get musicians playing tightly together, they're all playing to the same PLP values, within a margin of error. When musicians are out of time with one another, it's because they're not doing that.

    I'm not saying that the band has to rigidly follow the drummer. I'm saying that the drummer determines the PLP curve for a song, because that's where you most often hear the tatum. Just because Bonham is a bit loose doesn't mean he's not doing the same thing, and just because a guitarist plays some intro chords also doesn't mean that the drummer doesn't do the same thing once he comes in.

    So when I say "Click is the only answer" to the problem of a drummer not being able to maintain a songs PLP curve, I literally mean it. Practicing to a click by yourself literally trains your brain to be better at tapping into these ideal PLP curves. 

    That's all a long winded way of say that practice makes perfect.

    @fastonebaz - your drummer simply needs to practice more, to a click and without the band. Let him count the song in at the start, even if your guitarist starts the song, and your band will sound tighter.

    Jalapeno said:
    Everyone in the band should be following the drummer. The drummer should be the master clock. IMHO.
    This would not work for The Who. 

    Nor Fleetwood Mac
    If you listen to 'The Chain' by Fleetwood Mac, you'll hear at the end when the bass does that F1 theme tune thing (lol) the drummer is still keeping time on the hihat... in order to keep the bassist in time.

    I don't think anything I'm saying is particularly revolutionary. Drummers keep time. It's their job. A guitarist, bassist, vocalist, keyboard player, etc... can choose to push against it, but the drums are the clock, the timing reference, and the pulse of the song.

    Even a solo acoustic performer... the snappy plectrum artifacts of strummed chords act as a percussive element, and define the timing. 

    Bye!

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • Also, bad drummers ruin great bands.

    Bye!

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 2reaction image Wisdom
  • PolarityManPolarityMan Frets: 7273
    Click is the only answer.
    Disagree, drummers are not always the problem, I can make a drummer slow down or speed up if I want to. 
    Check first who he is following and can he hear them, 2nd, watch a video of yourself playing and listen where bassist plays his notes, on before or just after the beat. Who is dominant guy in band?

    When we changed from one bassist to the next, despite bassist being far better, the rhythm was a struggle between drummer and bassist. It really upset the balance. Another drummer always slowed down, so we put a monitor with rhythm guitar up loud in the mix, never slowed down again. 
    Everyone in the band should be following the drummer. The drummer should be the master clock. IMHO.
    I think this is a myth perpetuated by the fact that there are a lot of drummers with awful timing and since they ahve never either practices with a click or acknowledged that they should be collaboratively arriving at the tempo they are actual unable to keep time to something else.

    I think when its a basic groove the drummer ought to be setting the tempo but there are tons of scenarios where the drummer needs to listen to someone else.There should always be a dominant part that is dictating the tempo and that is often but not always the drums.

    The reason a click is so good is because it doesn't allow any interpretation about who was right / wrong....except in our band where the drummer insists that the click speeds up and slows down *sigh*
    ဈǝᴉʇsɐoʇǝsǝǝɥɔဪቌ
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • stickyfiddlestickyfiddle Frets: 26753
     Jalapeno said:
    Everyone in the band should be following the drummer. The drummer should be the master clock. IMHO.
    This would not work for The Who. 

    Nor Fleetwood Mac
    If you listen to 'The Chain' by Fleetwood Mac, you'll hear at the end when the bass does that F1 theme tune thing (lol) the drummer is still keeping time on the hihat... in order to keep the bassist in time.

    I don't think anything I'm saying is particularly revolutionary. Drummers keep time. It's their job. A guitarist, bassist, vocalist, keyboard player, etc... can choose to push against it, but the drums are the clock, the timing reference, and the pulse of the song.
     
    Maybe he's just on the hihat because it sounds better? Who knows. I'm not 

    Also, bad drummers ruin great bands.
    I totally agree. That said, I don't think wavering tempo necessarily means bad drumming, if it's intentional and fits the energy of the song. 

    I've seen a lot of drumming videos that are technically spectacular with great timing yet totally horrible bland drumming.
    The Assumptions - UAE party band for all your rock & soul desires
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • PolarityManPolarityMan Frets: 7273
    ICBM said:
    WiresDreamDisasters said:

    Everyone in the band should be following the drummer. The drummer should be the master clock. IMHO.
    Defo.  Can't be any other way.  The drummers prime job is to set and maintain the tempo.
    Not sure I agree with that. A really good drummer doesn't just press go and set off like a clockwork toy, they listen to the rest of the band and work together to adjust the tempo if necessary.
    Well, I disagree with your disagreement :)

    In one of our new songs our drummer goes from 105bpm to 160bpm for only 4 quarter notes and then back to 150bpm for the rest of the song.

    I mapped this out based on about 10 different performances we did in the practice room. He was very consistent.

    Consistency is the key. Using a click doesn't imply you never stray from the pulse, or change it altogether. It just implies that you're working on being consistent with your clocking.

    It shouldn't be necessary to monitor the tempo on the fly in case of drastic changes. The drummer should know what the hell he is doing so that the rest of the band can follow.

    A band shouldn't really be going up on stage to play Mustang Sally or whatever, and constantly starting or ending with different speeds. That just isn't professional. It's sloppy. This is completely different to having known and expected shifts in the time.

    A band also shouldn't be held to ransom by it's worst performing member either.

    I find musicians who are anti-clicks really aggravating. They love to pretend that if they did use a click, it would ruin their vibe, their jive, their groove, etc... it's bullshit. Complete bullshit. It's just an excuse to avoid work and remain as a sloppy musician.

    Fundamentally, I have high expectations for this kind of thing. Musicians get better when they practice to a click.
    A click is for bands (note Bands) that cant keep time, or if they are using it in conjunction with lighting effects and part of a stage show. Not against clicks, I have always looked to solve problem than mask it. 
    You dont get to the point where you can keep time without a click unless you practice to one. So I think the argument is that its really good to rpactice and record to one even if you dont play to one live.
    ဈǝᴉʇsɐoʇǝsǝǝɥɔဪቌ
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Like I said, there is a margin of error and that is for each beat. Nail it dead on... Static sounding drums... Unrealistic for most drummers to attain anyway. Be very far out... Poor performance.

    Bye!

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • PolarityManPolarityMan Frets: 7273
    lukedlb said:
    This quantized john bonham video neatly shows the dangers of too strict a time keeping. Sort of rock vs disco analogy:
    https://youtu.be/hT4fFolyZYU
    I think the problem is that he straightened a swung part, setting up a swing grid first might have got better results.
    ဈǝᴉʇsɐoʇǝsǝǝɥɔဪቌ
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • PolarityManPolarityMan Frets: 7273
    There are some Rush compositions for which Alex and Geddy are riffing in a compound, shifting time signature. Neil did the counting and realised that he could sail through all that in 4/4 and still land on the one when the composition returned to 4/4.
    That's a simple poly-rhythmic case. The underlying pulse is still pretty much the same on all instruments, regardless of time signatures.

    There is a thing called a "predominant local pulse" which is essentially a measure of the tatum of a piece of audio - the driving pulse you could think of it as, which is usually a 4th, 8th, 16th, or 32nd. This occurs in all rhythmic music and is what our ears tune into in order to clap along. It's a concept that comes from Music Information Retrieval, and is modelled on how the human brain perceives rhythm.

    When you get musicians playing tightly together, they're all playing to the same PLP values, within a margin of error. When musicians are out of time with one another, it's because they're not doing that.

    I'm not saying that the band has to rigidly follow the drummer. I'm saying that the drummer determines the PLP curve for a song, because that's where you most often hear the tatum. Just because Bonham is a bit loose doesn't mean he's not doing the same thing, and just because a guitarist plays some intro chords also doesn't mean that the drummer doesn't do the same thing once he comes in.

    So when I say "Click is the only answer" to the problem of a drummer not being able to maintain a songs PLP curve, I literally mean it. Practicing to a click by yourself literally trains your brain to be better at tapping into these ideal PLP curves. 

    That's all a long winded way of say that practice makes perfect.

    @fastonebaz - your drummer simply needs to practice more, to a click and without the band. Let him count the song in at the start, even if your guitarist starts the song, and your band will sound tighter.

    Jalapeno said:
    Everyone in the band should be following the drummer. The drummer should be the master clock. IMHO.
    This would not work for The Who. 

    Nor Fleetwood Mac
    If you listen to 'The Chain' by Fleetwood Mac, you'll hear at the end when the bass does that F1 theme tune thing (lol) the drummer is still keeping time on the hihat... in order to keep the bassist in time.

    I don't think anything I'm saying is particularly revolutionary. Drummers keep time. It's their job. A guitarist, bassist, vocalist, keyboard player, etc... can choose to push against it, but the drums are the clock, the timing reference, and the pulse of the song.

    Even a solo acoustic performer... the snappy plectrum artifacts of strummed chords act as a percussive element, and define the timing. 
    I think this is really interesting..wish I had got to it before my first reply.

    It pretty much explains the counter examples I can think of, like when a guitar is playing 1/6ths over a half time feel beat, in that case the tempo should be dictated by the guitarist.

    Again when the drums are playing an embellishment, or solo style piece then one or more elements in the rest of the band will be playing the dominant repeated rhythmic elements and hence setting tempo.
    ဈǝᴉʇsɐoʇǝsǝǝɥɔဪቌ
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • TheBigDipperTheBigDipper Frets: 4722
    Also, bad drummers ruin great bands.
    Absolutely. Bad anything can ruin a band, as I'm sure you'd agree. Drummers are in short supply. That means the bar for accepting a drummer into a band can often be lower - just because you're grateful to have a drummer at all. 

    (And then, once they get good, they want to play Jazz....  )  :# 

    I also totally agree that everyone should practice using a metronome to develop the skill of playing in tempo and not fluctuating. I'm just not so keen on the idea that a musical performance should always be to a click or that the drummer always provides the tempo for the band to follow.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 2reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.