Picked up a battered Vintage SG style guitar a couple of months ago at Lancashire guitar show for £90.
My first Gibson style guitar and it took a little getting used to, but I've fallen for the thing.
Had it set up properly and it feels great. Lovely neck, stays in tune.
Pre Wilkinson branded hardware, 3 piece body, black headstock, chrome tuners.
Absolutely no idea of the year or which (Chinese?) factory it was made in, there's no serial number.
Everyone comments on how nicely it plays and it has a surprising variety of very pleasant tones.
Resonates like a good 'un and it's very inspiring to play.
I tried a couple of the newer Gibson SG's last week and I just couldn't justify the near £1000 price difference. Yes, they had a lovely finish and sounded different, but not necessarily better on first acquaintance.
As someone who hasn't owned a genuine Gibson, what am I missing?
Sorry if this is a daft question but I've never owned a proper one, so have no idea.
Given that I have fallen quite heavily for the scruffy old thing, would it be worth investing in a posh nut and some nicer pots, pickups or tuners?
It stands me at about £140 so far.
I've no intention of getting rid of the scruffy old Hector, just wondering if a few upgrades would be worth it in the long run.
Sorry if this is a daft question and thanks in advance!
Comments
There are a multitude of reasons the Gibson is more expensive (though you can get a Gibson SG for much less than £1090).
I suppose the answer to your question is that, since you've played the Gibson ones and don't find it to be better, you're not missing out on anything by having a cheaper version.
Check the "Harley Benton vs. Gibson Les Paul" thread for more of an explanation of why it's naive to think a cheapo guitar is actually as good as an expensive one but none of those matter if you don't notice them.
Re: the upgrades on your Vintage; if by "posh nut" you mean a normal bone or graphtec etc. nut, the new nut itself won't give you any benefit but it's possible that the nut on a £90 guitar won't be cut as well as one installed by someone who charges you £90 just to install a nut. But if you don't have any problems caused by your current one, a new nut won't do anything.
Changing the pots won't do anything either other than possibly give you a different taper or maybe last longer (though you might want to just replace them if and when they do break).
Tuners are something I'd expect to be possibly poor on a £90 guitar but you say at the start of your post that it stays in tune so what else could you possibly expect from any other tuners? If you find it cumbersome to tune the guitar; e.g. the needle on the tuner jumps way past the note from a tiny turn, better tuners could give you more "resolution".
Goes without saying that pickups will change the sound (potentially massively) but, again, you say you like the sound of the guitar as it is.
So in conclusion - you seem to like the guitar a lot by the way you talk about it so why change anything on it? Also, you don't seem to like a Gibson any more than the one you have so you're not missing out anything by not buying a Gibson.
• Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/@Goldeneraguitars
As @thegummy alluded to the Gibson was of slightly better quality across the board. It also felt more "solid"- it's maybe an intangible, but the Gibson felt more rigid & like all the parts fitted together more securely. There are lots of jokes made about Gibson QC, but I've not had cause to complain.
The VS6 was an excellent guitar & I pretty much played it to death- things started to fail (tuners & pots) & the neck was in the thin side & had a bit of "flex" to it & could be pulled/pushed to bend notes. The guitar made me smile though.
Then there IS the name on the headstock. @GoldenEraGuitars is possibly being funny about the premium certain brands place on their name (& their misguided PR), but if it matters to you it matters. If not? Brilliant. Enjoy your Vintage.
http://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/61134/sarge/p1
Your guitar sounds like a perfect fit, don’t ruin it
Love it!
It's all about personal preference and you are in the minority... not blinded by branding
Though you will probably remain curious. Nothing wrong with that.
I've got the V72 semihollow Tele but I want their Strat, their V52/62 Teles and the new VS6/SG in the local guitar shop. There's also a really nice LP/PRS style one in the local shop which looks and plays lovely. That's the thing I find with most of the ones I've tried - they feel and play great, the build quality tends to be tight, and while they might not have the 'mojo' of some older, branded guitars, they're all very competent. And the pickups in the V72 I've got sound way more Tele than my actual Fender Tele which has upgraded Fender pickups too, particularly at the bridge.
The only thing I'd replace might be the tuners and maybe the nut, and if the pickups don't inspire you, they can be done further down the line.
And while I do think it's highly likely that if the OP got a Gibson and played it plenty for at least a few weeks he would prefer it, sex is free and Gibson guitars aren't so he's possibly better off preferring the one he already has.
NB: my opinions of Gibson vs cheaper copies is based on Les Pauls; I only played an SG for the first time last night and I personally wouldn't want one from any brand.
E.g. I really liked the PRS SE HFS pickup so was trying to find which boutique pickup was similar to that cause it must be even better.
It seems to make sense at first but really it makes more sense to keep a pickup I like or change it to something different if I don't.
the best guitars are scruffy old Hectors, so enjoy it and don’t change a thing.
this used to be a vintage vr100lm spent more on parts and the paint job than i did on the original guitar, but its bloody lovely
You know, I think I'll leave it just as it is.
Maybe just a Gibson style sticker on the headstock saying ''Authentic'.