It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Me - These days, I'm not interested in playing out regularly, in being "the entertainment" or doing it on a semi-pro basis for extra income. That means I'm not looking to do lots of gigs, nor play from the "everyone does these coz the audience loves them" covers book. (Not that I'm dissing it - I've changed and don't want to spend my time doing it any more, that's all).
I'm between bands at the moment, so these comments are more about what I've done in the recent past and would like to do again in the future. Why did the last one stop? Not enough mutual respect between people and people not doing any personal work on stuff in between sessions.
So, for me, practice sessions are as important to me as any gigs. I like the regular meet-up. I like the playing together and trying new things out in a "safe space". I prefer to play originals these days, or heavily-customised covers that might not sound like the famous recording. This requires the band to play together more to find their spot in the music. That creative exercise is a fun part for me.
If the main writer just sends out demos and says "learn your part" then it's just a different sort of covers band for the rest, isn't it? As a writer, I start by sending out a demo and saying "this is roughly what's in my head, so let's see how we can turn it into our arrangement and discuss things at the next practice". Which requires people to have a listen, and have a think about what they might do with their piece of it before turning up to the next practice.
But they shouldn't be "social" events in the sense that going to the pub together is social. People still need to practice their parts at home - learning the song structure, who comes in when, and when we all stop dead together.
If you're a covers band, or a function band or a tribute band then it's a different game. Sending out detailed arrangements and learning your part so it fits with what the others are playing shows you respect the others enough to not waste their time. If they've done the work and you haven't, it is quite telling.
Back to the OP. If the pros in the band would like to practice less, it might mean they feel practice sessions are wasting their time because they're just observing some of the band doing the hard work to learn something that they should have done at home earlier. Something they've already done. Having less practice sessions might be seen as forcing the others to get it done in private because the band practices are not frequent enough any more.
Bands and people, eh?
Practices are just for working out new stuff now.. we do a quick test run to see if we can play the main parts of a new tune. If it feels good we agree to have it ready for next time. We've put a song straight into the set on a Saturday when we hadn't tried it before the previous Wednesday too.
Edit: we're a covers band.
I would count myself as a hobbyist, albeit one that has been playing for some years and has played in a few different styles. I don’t think of myself as a professional level player, but I do know that with experience, learning your parts gets to be something that you do very efficiently. For a lot of rock music, I’d go as far as to say it becomes easy and requires very little effort. Retaining the material in your memory also becomes really easy. I suspect that for professional players, they can do this stuff in their sleep.
At a lower level of experience and aptitude, learning your parts requires considerable effort and is prone to mistakes. You might get to a rehearsal only for someone to tell that there’s something not right about what your playing; then you have to go through the process of unlearning what you already have and relearning it correctly (hopefully). Furthermore it takes further effort and practice to get the music properly installed in your memory. The whole thing takes sufficient effort that it’s difficult to fit it into the rest of your life, so you rely on rehearsals to give you more practice time.
I think the key problem is this: if you’re the guy who needs rehearsals to supplement your practice time, you will feel that you are winning during rehearsals; you are getting better at your stuff and the band is sounding better for it.
However, if you’re the other guy, who got all his homework done already, you will not feel that you are winning during rehearsals, because you’ve already done your winning at home. You may even feel like you are losing, because you’re just going through the motions of playing easy stuff while waiting for others to sort their stuff out.
For professional level players, I think they’d need to be very tolerant individuals to keep turning up for rehearsals that they don’t need. If they also don’t need the social side (and it sounds like they don’t), then yes, you’ve got a problem.
ooh. Long post. Sorry.
'Homework' is one thing - making sure you've learned stuff so you can continue to progress from where you left off.
And it's frustrating if people can't remember stuff time and time again.
If you're doing it to explore new ideas, write stuff together or jam to find new musical inspiration, then that can't be done at home on your own, the joy is in the playing itself.
That said, some people like to learn a list of songs and perform them for money or pleasure. Nowt wrong with that.
Might be that people want different things.
Also, people showing up late, wasting time on non music is as waste of rehearsal time, you may as well meet down the pub.
For an originals band...they're usually combined rehearsal of existing material (doubles as warm-up), writing sessions and band meetings. Less of an emphasis on preparedness, and more of a collaborative effort.
All too bloody difficult if you ask me. Maybe time to throw it in
I wish it was always that easy...but it's true.
For me, rehearsal is ensuring that the whole band performance is working well as a unit. Personally I would be very surprised if there’s any professional band out there that goes on tour without rehearsal.
Setting that aside, if one half of the band needs rehearsal and the other half doesn’t then you do rehearsal. Otherwise, the gig ends up with half the band stressed, miserable and most likely making mistakes. The audience won’t care that there’s a couple of band members who clearly know what they’re doing, they’ll just see and hear the whole shoddy picture.
Touring bands for example don't need to rehearse every week as they're playing so often they know the setlist inside out. I guess if the shows are less often then you can get a bit slack and forget arrangements and parts, hence why you need to brush up on them but as a band. All well and good playing with a recording but you don't play with a recording live.
We don't play every week, our target is 12 a year i.e one gig a month so far we have done 14 and have 5 more booked.
We rehearse most weeks and we have a wish list of possible songs to add to our roster so there is always something fresh to work on. Some songs come to fruition quickly some take a while and some don't make the cut.
We never play the same set twice.
It is hard to match ability and commitment levels though.
Originals I’m happy to rehearse but that time is normally hanging out with my mates and writing songs and being creative so it’s more of an outlet in that respect.
In my covers band we just have a list of tunes we need to learn and do one rehearsal to tighten them all up.
Honestly if I had to do regular rehearsals in a cover band that was my job and constantly go through the songs etc I’d probably leave.