Chapman Youtube Drama Continues...

Haych

So, if you were Chappers, what would your next move be?

soma1975

the_butler siad:

Or 'Adam' perhaps is a sock account of Chapman's, admittedly speculation, but 8 minutes is a pretty fast response time

octatonic

This is SOOOO boring.

tony99

Haych said:

So, if you were Chappers, what would your next move be?

Figure 4 leg lock, followed by a ridgehand chop to the solar plexus!!!!

KAPPPOW!!

Haych

tony99 said:

Haych said:

So, if you were Chappers, what would your next move be?

Figure 4 leg lock, followed by a ridgehand chop to the solar plexus!!!!

KAPPPOW!!

that genuinely made me lol. 

tony99

Haych said:

tony99 said:

Haych said:

So, if you were Chappers, what would your next move be?

Figure 4 leg lock, followed by a ridgehand chop to the solar plexus!!!!

KAPPPOW!!

that genuinely made me lol. 

I've seriously got nothing to do today.

mbe

Alas, poor Chappers! We knew him well, a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy. He hath borne us on his back a thousand times, and now, how abhorred in our imagination it is! Mighty Dorje rises at it. —Where be your gibes now? Your gambols? Your songs?

tony99

mbe said:

Alas, poor Chappers! We knew him well, a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy. He hath borne us on his back a thousand times, and now, how abhorred in our imagination it is! Mighty Dorje rises at it. —Where be your gibes now? Your gambols? Your songs?

Darth's already done Hamlet, I've done Richard II, you'll have to change it.

Do The Tempest if ya want.

mbe

tony99 said:

mbe said:

Alas, poor Chappers! We knew him well, a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy. He hath borne us on his back a thousand times, and now, how abhorred in our imagination it is! Mighty Dorje rises at it. —Where be your gibes now? Your gambols? Your songs?

Darth's already done Hamlet, I've done Richard II, you'll have to change it.

Do The Tempest if ya want.

Sos. I will try work something up on the Merry Wives of Windsor.

Here goes...

Chappers thinks the devil will not have him damned, lest the snake oil that's in him should set youtube on fire.

Philtre

"Till he unseam'd him from the nave to the Chappers,

And fix'd his head upon our battlements"

Spoken by The Captain

Macbeth, Act I, Scene 2

https://sites.google.com/site/aesmacbeth8/act-i-scene-ii

Funkfingers

Haych said:

So, if you were Chappers, what would your next move be?

Porn to queen's handbag. Cheque!

GoldenEraGuitars

octatonic said:

This is SOOOO boring.

Oh please, you want to know EVERYTHING that is going on in this little internet drama

TimmyO

Ordinarily you could safely file me under "not interested, each to their wossname, I'll click something else" but the video from the OP in this thread came up in my feed, I watched it, and got sucked in ha.

Having therefore now seen the main stuff (just in reverse order) I do kinda get why folk are saying that The Chappening is reflecting most critically on Mr C. 

His response video came across to me like what you'd get if you hired a scriptwriter to try and mashup The Office and Spinal Tap and set it in the world of YouTube Guitar influencers. 

So off-key, so un-self-aware - just really odd. My takeaway ended up being "wow. I hope this guy is ok" 

mixolyd

the_butler said:

mixolyd said:

Fortheloveofguitar said:

mixolyd said:

Not sure which video this comment came from but how did this play out? What was Chappers response?

i think some of the commenters here might be little naive on the YouTube commenting system and how large channels influence it.  By replying to Adam’s threatening comment, Chapman is promoting it to his many followers.  This is roughly equivalent to making a post stickied at the top of this forum, or giving it >100 upvotes on Reddit.  The information-free content of his reply makes sense here - he’s not really trying to say anything, just making sure the comment is seen by his followers who will then upvote it.

The mere 8 minutes between the two comments supports KDH’s accusation that Chapman has published his video targeting KDH for harassment, then gone to KDH’s video to watch his followers carry out said harassment and amplify the most heinous example.  At this point, KDH is forced to either remove the comments (knowing more are on the way) or remove the video which is what he did.  Chapman wins: another good day for Chappers PLC.

Or 'Adam' perhaps is a sock account of Chapman's, admittedly speculation, but 8 minutes is a pretty fast response time

Indeed this is possible.  Through repeated dishonesty and doucheness he has opened himself to this speculation and encouraged spectators to interpret his actions in the dimmest possible light.

I’d liken his position to the semi-guilt limbo Prince Andrew found himself in.  We have photos of him entering Jeffrey Epstein’s house that afternoon, we have photos of him leaving it a while later.  A pubescent girl was found crying on a mattress repeating unspeakable things between her sobs.

We don’t know he did it, we can’t prove he did it, but he’s done everything to help make our minds up about him, including make a cringey public appearance (Andrew’s BBC interview, Chappers’ outdoor iPhone video linked above) attempting to smooth over his questionable behaviour by either lying outright or avoiding the real questions and trying to distract our attention with guff.

”It’s such a strange world...and there’s so much to learn...and I’m learning so much.“ - Prince Andrew Duke of Chappers, 2020.

At the time of writing, as far as I can tell, Chappers has still not called for his supporters to stop harassing and threatening his detractors.  “I really appreciate how involved you are in everything I do” sounds more like an endorsement if anything.

Adam_MD

mixolyd said:

I’d liken his position to the semi-guilt limbo Prince Andrew found himself in.  We have photos of him entering Jeffrey Epstein’s house that afternoon, we have photos of him leaving it a while later.  A pubescent girl was found crying on a mattress repeating unspeakable things between her sobs.

We don’t know he did it, we can’t prove he did it, but he’s done everything to help make our minds up about him, including make a cringey public appearance (Andrew’s BBC interview, Chappers’ outdoor iPhone video linked above) attempting to smooth over his questionable behaviour by either lying outright or avoiding the real questions and trying to distract our attention with guff.

 

tony99

Adam_MD said:

mixolyd said:

I’d liken his position to the semi-guilt limbo Prince Andrew found himself in.  We have photos of him entering Jeffrey Epstein’s house that afternoon, we have photos of him leaving it a while later.  A pubescent girl was found crying on a mattress repeating unspeakable things between her sobs.

We don’t know he did it, we can’t prove he did it, but he’s done everything to help make our minds up about him, including make a cringey public appearance (Andrew’s BBC interview, Chappers’ outdoor iPhone video linked above) attempting to smooth over his questionable behaviour by either lying outright or avoiding the real questions and trying to distract our attention with guff.

 

Still can't believe Fonzy made that, a truly brave endeavour, and don't forget this was the 70s (or maybe early 80s by this point) so before stuntmen were a thing, so that really was Arthur Winkerelli or whatever he's called.

mgaw

when Fonzy splays his legs over the shark net below, is that technique or is he teasing said shark?

tony99

God I hated Richie Cunningham, don't mind him so. much now he's bald.

Has anyone seen his weird looking brother? Used to be the little kid in Gentle Ben?

ten77guitar

tony99 said:

Adam_MD said:

mixolyd said:

I’d liken his position to the semi-guilt limbo Prince Andrew found himself in.  We have photos of him entering Jeffrey Epstein’s house that afternoon, we have photos of him leaving it a while later.  A pubescent girl was found crying on a mattress repeating unspeakable things between her sobs.

We don’t know he did it, we can’t prove he did it, but he’s done everything to help make our minds up about him, including make a cringey public appearance (Andrew’s BBC interview, Chappers’ outdoor iPhone video linked above) attempting to smooth over his questionable behaviour by either lying outright or avoiding the real questions and trying to distract our attention with guff.

 

Still can't believe Fonzy made that, a truly brave endeavour, and don't forget this was the 70s (or maybe early 80s by this point) so before stuntmen were a thing, so that really was Arthur Winkerelli or whatever he's called.

I’m pretty sure there were stuntmen in the 70s and well before then. Still, a pretty impressive stunt nonetheless though if he had landed in the net I imagine the shark would have been more scared than him!

tony99

ten77guitar said:

tony99 said:

Adam_MD said:

mixolyd said:

I’d liken his position to the semi-guilt limbo Prince Andrew found himself in.  We have photos of him entering Jeffrey Epstein’s house that afternoon, we have photos of him leaving it a while later.  A pubescent girl was found crying on a mattress repeating unspeakable things between her sobs.

We don’t know he did it, we can’t prove he did it, but he’s done everything to help make our minds up about him, including make a cringey public appearance (Andrew’s BBC interview, Chappers’ outdoor iPhone video linked above) attempting to smooth over his questionable behaviour by either lying outright or avoiding the real questions and trying to distract our attention with guff.

 

Still can't believe Fonzy made that, a truly brave endeavour, and don't forget this was the 70s (or maybe early 80s by this point) so before stuntmen were a thing, so that really was Arthur Winkerelli or whatever he's called.

I’m pretty sure there were stuntmen in the 70s and well before then. Still, a pretty impressive stunt nonetheless though if he had landed in the net I imagine the shark would have been more scared than him!

First stuntman was 1986,  a generic baddie fell out of a first floor window in an episode of The A-team.