It's been a few weeks since I finished my Princeton Reverb rebuild. I did a quick-and-dirty distortion pedal after that but I fancied another amp project. Weber did a kit amp called the Maggie - it looks to be based on the early 5F2A Fender Princeton circuit, which itself is basically a Champ with a tone control. The Weber circuit has some boost/voicing options that don't really interest me, but it runs a 6L6 instead of a 6V6. I used to own a Swart STR which could run either, and I much preferred the more open sound of the 6L6. I have some suitable transformers, so that's the way I'm headed.
I don't want to be bothered with woodwork, so I snagged a dead Line 6 Spider III on eBay. This is the first picture from the listing:
Comments
The recycled PT mounts through the chassis, so I used a drill and my new had nibbler tool to make a rectangular hole - fortunately for me it's made of aluminium. The secondary leads will be inside the chassis, which would leave the primary connections exposed in the speaker cab, so I fabricated a cover from some sheet aluminium.
I am thinking of building the circuit on 2-row tag board, or possibly two parallel tag strips.
The speaker will be a Jensen C12Q - should complement the tweedy circuit nicely.
I've just noticed I've missed out the HT fuse, which won't be accessible without pulling the chassis.
As far as I can see the Weber Maggie circuit is the same as the Fender 5F2A except for:
1. Voicing options via 3-way switch on preamp cathode - not using this;
2. 6L6 instead of 6V6;
3. Bigger transformers - my OT is rated 10W and my recycled PT seems to have plenty of power on tap; and
4. Screen grid resistor on output valve.
I intend to try the amp with both 6L6 and 6V6 valves. I have several single 6V6s to try and a TAD 6L6 on order. As well as listening to how they sound I will check voltages and currents to make sure nothing is getting damaged.
Connected the OT primary wires and bundled up the unused secondary wires with heat shrink. Started fitting the wires to the main tag strips.
Wired up the input socket with screened signal cable. Was going to wire up the pots but discovered the 1M pots I had saved from a dead Carvin all read 1.3M to 1.4M! Ordered some Alpha pots and a pair of white cup-cake knobs. Mmm...
Made most of the wire connections from the tag strips. Decided to fit the first filter cap while I was at it as the mounting hole was getting a bit full. I hope this works first time as it is pig to work inside this chassis!
Installed most of the components between the stag strips:
Then realised my grounding scheme was bollocks, belatedly remembered the Modulus layout I'd seen, and spent an hour wrangling leads in and out of place. There is now a copper bus bar joining the filter caps, and the grounds follow a multiple star layout.
My thoughts at this time:
The big cement 220R resistor is a temporary measure intended to bring the B+ voltages close to the Fender spec with a 6V6 fitted - they mostly are, but it's only dropping a few volts. With that extra resistor bypassed I get plate dissipations of:
- 6V6 (JJ) - 15.74W (112% max)
- 6L6 (TAD) 17.49W (58% max)
My plan is to remove the 220R resistor and just replace it with a wire as per the original Fender design (albeit I've added an HT fuse). I'll then install a slightly larger bias resistor to get the PD of a 6V6 down to about 70-80% of max, and fit a rear-panel switch to bring in another resistor in parallel with it to optimise bias for a 6L6.I haven't actually tried a guitar through the amp yet, but the volume and tone controls operate as expected. There is a small amount of 50Hz (not 100Hz) background hum but I'm only noticing it because the speaker is up on my work bench.
I'm off to bed now and hope to do a bit more tomorrow.
I replaced the extra 220R resistor with a wire and played about with the V2 cathode resistor, ending up with 1k (actually 989R) for running with a 6V6. I tried adding a 680R resistor in parallel with that for 6L6 operation and that gave a reasonable plate dissipation figure. I could probably have gone lower but you end up chasing your tail, as more current through the valve pulls B+ down and raises the cathode voltage, and the PD doesn’t move much. Besides which a valve doesn’t have to be pushed close to destruction to sound good!
I put the 680R on a back panel toggle switch directly above V2 as a reminder when changing valves. If the switch is in the 6L6 position with a 6V6 fitted it’s going to get very hot!
I then checked voltages and PD with 4 different 6V6s in place and got PDs from 70% to 77% of max. I also did a quick guitar test with each one to make sure none were noisy or otherwise playing up. Finally I installed the chassis in the cab with a Tung Sol 6V6 in V2.
I like it! There's not a great deal of clean headroom available - from about 4 on the amp volume it is starting to break up. But the magic happens when you back off the guitar volume and you get this lovely harmonic richness, particularly with a Les Paul. It brought to mind a video of Joe Bonamassa demonstrating all the sounds you could get from a Les Paul into a Champ - hardly surprising really! I've linked the vid below.
With a 6V6 there is a very low level of background hum. With a 6L6 on board the headroom and available volume increases substantially, as does the bass (and the hum). So far I think I prefer the response of a 6V6, so I am going to take my time comparing the 6V6s I have on hand - Tung Sol, Groove Tubes, JJ, and vintage Brimar.
Here's a couple of pics of the finished article. I realise I forgot to take a final gut shot before putting the chassis into the cab, but I plan to move the fuse holder to the back panel, so I'll take some more pics then. Also look out for a phone recording.
Oh yes, the name. It's Spanish for dead Spider!
The amp is much brighter than I would expect a tweed Champ to be, to the extent that my cheap-and-cheerful Mosky Spring Reverb (actually based on 3 delay chips like many such pedals) produces a veritable miasma of noise. At some point I will try it with a different speaker.
As promised, gut shots of the finished (ha!) amp.