I thought I'd start this discussion as there were some good points going on on the other thread.
So as per the law anyone selling online has to abide by distance selling regulations. this is a fact and unequivocal. However i thought Id throw in a few things that people may not be aware of and even my own stance upon it.
as a company owner, i obviously do my best to ensure a product ships in a timely and safe manner. I want customers to be happy and enjoy any product I make. Being realistic, sometimes people don't get on with what we make and i understand that they may want to ship them back. However there are a number of things that hurt as a business owner and I'm certain not everyone is aware.
1) we get charged by our website and payment provider 3-4% even if you cancel your order. This isn't returned to us and has a significant affect on the bottom line. Some may say that we should bake that in to the RRP, and yes simple logic suggests that is the case... however realistically we have to compete and adding 4% to every RRP to cover this eventuality would hurt the bottom line too.
2) its not free to ship. Firstly we employ someone to do shipping and we use brand new packaging for every order regardless. these all attract a cost that is lost if the item is cancelled. and the shipping cost isn't insignificant either.
3) any damaged (mild or otherwise) product cannot be sold at anything close to RRP and consequently another cost to the business.
In short buying to try costs any business money and when margins are tight, can significantly hurt a business.
My personal stance on my purchases that i make sits as follows. if im unsure ill like it i either
a)don't buy
b)buy knowing ill sell on of its not to my taste
c)make the effort to go and try it.
why do i do this, well i feel personally that if the product is fine and its just me that doesn't like it, then thats my fault and the shop/seller shouldn't suffer. Lots of other peoples moral compasses are different, i get that too.
anyway, what do you all think?
Adrian Thorpe MBE | Owner of ThorpyFx Ltd | Email: thorpy@thorpyfx.com | Twitter:
@ThorpyFx | Facebook: ThorpyFx Ltd | Website:
www.thorpyfx.com
Comments
But I am very careful how I handle the goods, and always return them very securely (often better than I received them..)
The likes of Andertons, G4M, Juno, GG and GAK get my money because their returns are effortless. G4M especially are superb.
I always use these as next day delivery are excellent.
Just my thoughts.
If the food is crap at McDonald's, I don't quietly send it back and give the owners some feedback. I just chalk it up to a shitty purchase. But if something happens at my local favourite cafe, I quietly pull the owner aside and give them my feedback so that they can shape their business and make sure the shitty thing didn't happen again.
Not sure that's relevant really.
But i guess its win win either way
But, you do have a returns policy on your website, and some people might want to utilise that.
I guess it’s down to an individual if you are willing to cost Adrian money personally to try his pedal. That’s a choice. Anyone is in their rights to do it but it is a choice of the buyer.
But do a lot of people do this just to have a free demo ? With no intentions of keeping it ?
Im amazed at that; maybe im niave.
In addition, internet retailers such as Asos have made returning stuff the norm, knowing that their business model doesn't work without customers being able to check whether clothes fit and return them (really easily) if they don't. The retail landscape has changed, especially with fitting rooms still closed at the mo.
@ThorpyFX You mentioned brand new packaging for each order. I assume that's so everything is pristine? How about recycling packaging and making a feature of it (plaster it over the packaging), thus gaining you green credentials and reducing costs? As a fussy bugger consumer, I'd buy into that. Also, how about something like the tourboxes we sometimes see on here? One of each of your pedals being passed between trialists. They wouldn't mind if it was battered and maybe it would save on trial and returns. Just thinking out loud.
Where I do object is where the returns process is abused. I highly suspect that some YouTube channels buy pedals, demo/review them, then return them. That leaves a real sour taste.
I've bought a lot of pedals over the last few years . . .
I have never considered returning something because I didn't like it.
I'm aware that I could, but it doesn't seem right to me.
I would send something back if it wasn't working or was damaged though.
The challenge faced is with the reduction in physical shops and the rise of pure play like Amazon or even small online retailers, and therefore there is nowhere to try products. I guess that's one of the big reasons for distance selling regs.
I can't recall an occasion whereby I've returned an item because I decided that I didn't want it, but I'm an older generation and I suspect that I represent a dwindling percentage of the market.
There does need to be protection in place to protect the consumer, and I suspect that the ‘bricks and mortar’ side of retail would say that the cost of returns is nothing when compared to the cost of high street rent and overheads, but it does annoy me when I read comments from people who order something and then return it, not because the product doesn’t match up to the billing, but because the consumer hadn’t thought things through.
“I wanted something to adjust the truss rod on my guitar so I ordered this hammer online. Turns out that I need an Alan Key, so it’s going back”.
if someone buys from Andertons and returns it, do Andertons then return it to you?
I must say Im really struggling here with this...
If the retailer is happy with sending 3 guitars (for example), and the buyer actually buys one, what is the difference between this and trying in a shop ?