It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
I have two push/pull pots, two mini pots and the usual JM switches.
Was thinking about the circuit above initially, but now thinking of wiring it more like a Les Paul, with the two push/pull pots used for volume, and two mini pots for tone.
Any suggestions? How would you configure a twin humbucker bari JM with normal JM controls?
If not, I suggest a five-way lever Superswitch, offering the Ibanez/DiMarzio circuit that yields
Neck HB (coils in series)
Neck HB (coils in parallel)
Neck + Bridge HB
Inside coils
Bridge HB
Master volume and tone, with push-pull on the volume for both pickups in series and push-pull on the tone for bass-cut.
Yes, this is going to be nightmarish to wire up (a series option means you have to be careful what you do with the ground connections to one of the pickups), but it will give you a huge variety of tones which I think will suit a baritone, while keeping it logical in use.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
@icbm that sounds exactly the sort of configuration I would like especially the idea of a bass cut. I will research this further!
Sorry for being a bit rubbish at this!
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
I recognise the Rothstein Guitars schematic diagram from it being linked into an article by Michael James Adams AKA Puisheen.
The single most important feature of the diagram is the use of single coil pickups.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
@icbm thanks for offering! I'm currently in a band with @camf so hopefully I'll get the chance to buy you a beer as a thank-you for all the help and advice you provide on here some time soon.
To be honest, I don't mind if you leave the series-parallel option out of it - I'd be more than happy with progressive coil splits and a bass-cut switch. I spend most of my time in bridge or middle positions so these options make the most sense.
That keeps all the ‘main’ functions on the lower side of the guitar, and the more fiddly - and quite possibly ‘set-and-forget’, once you’ve found your favourite sounds - on the upper side.
That’s also somewhat less of a pig to wire! Although it’s still going to be quite a faff...
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Any confusion on my part stems from the Rothstein Guitars schematic diagram. (Two vols, no master treble roll off.) Should that diagram be eliminated from enquiries?
I assume that "volume control one" refers to the conventional pot near the output jack socket. "Volume control two" would refer to the Rhythm Circuit roller pot.
If this is a bespoke build, it might help to know whether the wiring channels are narrow, like a Jaguar, or cavernous, like a Jazzmaster.
Pickup resistance now measured - Chisel neck 7.4k, Alnico Grande bridge 14.3k. Again my ignorance about guitar electrics comes in to play here, however I believe the outputs of the pickups are better matched than these figures suggest...
Jags are straight channels running between the ends of its pickups. JMs are usually chambered - like a "smuggler's Telecaster.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein