I love the tone of this 1965 champ from one of Johan's vids, and trying to understand what I'm hearing:
https://youtu.be/Krqic3DFlKo?t=151 From another vid, you can see that it has the original Oxford 8EV installed (not a Jensen like he indicates in the vid).
I have a silverface champ that has been serviced, with a P8R reissue that sounds great, but I cannot nail the tones from the vid. Despite having the same circuitry, it doesn't drive in the same way. Where that '66 sounds like it's all bloated and about to fall apart (which I love), mine has some of that low end squish at the same settings but doesn't squeal in the same way - it's much more controlled, harder, more meaty, and a lot cleaner.
I'm assuming this is just down to the 'crappy' speaker in that thing? The only other difference really is the smaller OT. I've read that blackface champs often sound 'browner' than the later ones. It seems odd as everyone talks about how bad the Oxford is, and if it's because it sounds like that^ then I guess I'm in the minority.
Any insight would be great - wondering whether I need to source an Oxford for mine, or consider selling up and investing in a blackface.
Comments
But I remember the cathode resistor was higher than most blackface vibrochamps and I don't think the plate voltage was that high either.
In old amps components will have drifted up or down, that can make a big difference and as you have guessed the speaker makes a big difference too.
Also that is an old amp, so it may not be stock.