Nano Cortex Review (another try at digital)

What's Hot
UnimprobableUnimprobable Frets: 58
edited October 2024 in FX Reviews
So, even though not gigging yet, dragging my combo and trying to keep track of pedal settings in band rehearsals isn't working for me, so I've ordered a nano cortex, fr12, and a mic. I'll profile my marshall sv20 and maybe even a katana clean sound I like, stick a bd or halycon gold in the front see If I can get on with the onboard effects .If that doesn't work I might give up on digital  untill 2030. To be fair, I haven't had a pa or frfr to truly test this stuff, so trying that this time. but yes, pod go went back, tone master pro went back - just too much hassle Vs plug into valve amp and go. hoping 3rd time lucky. I do quite like some amplitude sounds I get in logic pro through headphones so not without hope digital, albeit profiling will work for me. If anyone's interested I'll let you know how I get on...
0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
«1

Comments

  • Danny1969Danny1969 Frets: 12881
    I think a lot of us have gone through the same journey at some point. Some make it work and are happy with it, some go back to an amp and pedals. 
    My trouble is I'm lazy and can't be bothered tweaking gear. If it doesn't sound organic and inspiring without a few minutes then I lose interest in it. Because my actual amp does sound organic and inspiring as soon as I turn it on. Those with more patience though will persevere and get a tone that is pretty good though and instantly recallable effects. 

    A lot of it is also down to how many sounds you need to cover.  If it's only a few then an amp and a few pedals is hard to beat for convenience. If it's loads of sounds then a modeller is a lot of work to begin with but then no work at all after .. to a certain extent. 

    Whatever you choose, enjoy the journey 
    www.2020studios.co.uk 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • DavusPGDavusPG Frets: 490
    Danny1969 said:

    My trouble is I'm lazy and can't be bothered tweaking gear. If it doesn't sound organic and inspiring without a few minutes then I lose interest in it. Because my actual amp does sound organic and inspiring as soon as I turn it on. 

    What amp do you play through Danny?

    I use a Fractal FM9 and have been gigging their modelling gear for the best part of a decade. As you rightly say, a lot of effort to begin with, but now it's plug and play unless I need a new specific sound and they're super quick to dial in anyway. 

    I do still get tempted by the idea of a valve amp, but on balance I don't think it'd be worth the aggro, and nobody other than me would notice the difference in tone, if indeed there was any.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • I’ve got a Nano Cortex and planning a Fender FR-10 shortly, be interesting to hear how you get on.  I’ve barely had chance to touch the NC this week with work being mental but hoping to have a deep dive tomorrow and rehearse with it on Sunday but through the PA. I definitely want a speaker before I gig it.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • VoxmanVoxman Frets: 5947
    Guys, wouldn't this thread be better in the digital section? 
    I started out with nothing..... but I've still got most of it left (Seasick Steve)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 4reaction image Wisdom
  • Danny1969Danny1969 Frets: 12881
    DavusPG said:
    Danny1969 said:

    My trouble is I'm lazy and can't be bothered tweaking gear. If it doesn't sound organic and inspiring without a few minutes then I lose interest in it. Because my actual amp does sound organic and inspiring as soon as I turn it on. 

    What amp do you play through Danny?

    I use a Fractal FM9 and have been gigging their modelling gear for the best part of a decade. As you rightly say, a lot of effort to begin with, but now it's plug and play unless I need a new specific sound and they're super quick to dial in anyway. 

    I do still get tempted by the idea of a valve amp, but on balance I don't think it'd be worth the aggro, and nobody other than me would notice the difference in tone, if indeed there was any.
    I have a Fender HRD which gets used the most but also a Marshall combo and a Matchless clone. I have done a lot of gigs with modelling and IEM's, no backline or speakers on stage at all but I still prefer the sound of my amps, even though they are  nothing special. 

    I play with 4 different bands and quite often just jump into an Uber with the HRD, a pedal board and a guitar. I have a little fold up trolley I use if I know the load is a bit grim but other than that its a pretty light setup 
    www.2020studios.co.uk 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • I've travelled the land, made mistakes out of hand,
    Seen the faces in the places misunderstand.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • p90foolp90fool Frets: 34559
    I'm fairly happy gigging my Pod Go, but tonight and tomorrow night's venues are wildly different in sound.
    Tonight's is fine but the one tomorrow has an overhanging partial ceiling over the stage then it goes up to a two-storey roof, and there's something about the shape of it which makes every amp sound boxy, even a 100w half stack. 

    On those occasions I like to have tweakable EQ, so I'll just use my pedal board so I can change things on the fly easily. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DiscoStuDiscoStu Frets: 6125
    I've got a Tonex Pedal going in to an FR-10. I'm really happy with it and it had its first gig on Saturday. 
    Only thing I found was that the sound guy wanted XLR out for DI which the Tonex doesn't have (only jack out) but luckily the FR-10 has one so he used that instead. Not sure how that compares sound wise to a DI straight from the Tonex but we sounded great anyway so all good. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DiscoStu said:
    I've got a Tonex Pedal going in to an FR-10. I'm really happy with it and it had its first gig on Saturday. 
    Only thing I found was that the sound guy wanted XLR out for DI which the Tonex doesn't have (only jack out) but luckily the FR-10 has one so he used that instead. Not sure how that compares sound wise to a DI straight from the Tonex but we sounded great anyway so all good. 
    Off topic, @DiscoStu ;but... I now always use a DI box when I'm playing out and going direct. Last year I had a sound engineer mistakenly send my "go direct" setup some phantom power down the XLR cable. That generated unpleasant noise that caused some pre-gig panic. But it might have broken something, so now I make sure there's no direct connection between my gear and the venues gear. I can't detect any difference when there's a DI box in the path, and these days my "go direct" sound is with a Tonex Pedal. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DiscoStuDiscoStu Frets: 6125
    DiscoStu said:
    I've got a Tonex Pedal going in to an FR-10. I'm really happy with it and it had its first gig on Saturday. 
    Only thing I found was that the sound guy wanted XLR out for DI which the Tonex doesn't have (only jack out) but luckily the FR-10 has one so he used that instead. Not sure how that compares sound wise to a DI straight from the Tonex but we sounded great anyway so all good. 
    Off topic, @DiscoStu ;but... I now always use a DI box when I'm playing out and going direct. Last year I had a sound engineer mistakenly send my "go direct" setup some phantom power down the XLR cable. That generated unpleasant noise that caused some pre-gig panic. But it might have broken something, so now I make sure there's no direct connection between my gear and the venues gear. I can't detect any difference when there's a DI box in the path, and these days my "go direct" sound is with a Tonex Pedal. 
    Cheers, that's good to know. I haven't gigged since the 90s and things have moved on so much! The advice on here was that I could go to FOH with the second jack output but the sound guy last week needed XLR so that threw me a bit.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DavusPG said:
    Danny1969 said:

    My trouble is I'm lazy and can't be bothered tweaking gear. If it doesn't sound organic and inspiring without a few minutes then I lose interest in it. Because my actual amp does sound organic and inspiring as soon as I turn it on. 

    What amp do you play through Danny?

    I use a Fractal FM9 and have been gigging their modelling gear for the best part of a decade. As you rightly say, a lot of effort to begin with, but now it's plug and play unless I need a new specific sound and they're super quick to dial in anyway. 

    I do still get tempted by the idea of a valve amp, but on balance I don't think it'd be worth the aggro, and nobody other than me would notice the difference in tone, if indeed there was any.
    I'm all for digital for various applications, whatever works, but I do wonder why people think valve amps are aggro?

    I've gigged them for getting on 30 years and never really had any problems.  Actually with the decent stuff (i.e. not made to a price PCB amps), I've had 0 problems.

    There is the weight, I think my amp (40W Emprize) weighs about 17kg, my 5E3 around 12kg, so there's not a massive saving going to an FRFR cab, you still have to cart that around.

    I suppose if you are lugging a Twin or AC30 around digital would look a lot more attractive.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DavusPGDavusPG Frets: 490
    edited September 2024
    That's fair - and I did gig a valve head before going digital.

    The aggro wasn't meant in terms of using it, but more the process of having to create new presets etc as I'd want to use it 4CM with the FM9 for effects and for the odd songs would still want the option of modelled amps.

    Even that wouldn't be that much of a hardship to be honest....I've come very close to trying a Suhr PT15 IR on several occasions so my aggro sentiment is possibly a way of trying to save myself some money! 

    I'll crack eventually no doubt
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • crunchmancrunchman Frets: 12224
    DavusPG said:
    Danny1969 said:

    My trouble is I'm lazy and can't be bothered tweaking gear. If it doesn't sound organic and inspiring without a few minutes then I lose interest in it. Because my actual amp does sound organic and inspiring as soon as I turn it on. 

    What amp do you play through Danny?

    I use a Fractal FM9 and have been gigging their modelling gear for the best part of a decade. As you rightly say, a lot of effort to begin with, but now it's plug and play unless I need a new specific sound and they're super quick to dial in anyway. 

    I do still get tempted by the idea of a valve amp, but on balance I don't think it'd be worth the aggro, and nobody other than me would notice the difference in tone, if indeed there was any.
    I'm all for digital for various applications, whatever works, but I do wonder why people think valve amps are aggro?

    I've gigged them for getting on 30 years and never really had any problems.  Actually with the decent stuff (i.e. not made to a price PCB amps), I've had 0 problems.

    There is the weight, I think my amp (40W Emprize) weighs about 17kg, my 5E3 around 12kg, so there's not a massive saving going to an FRFR cab, you still have to cart that around.

    I suppose if you are lugging a Twin or AC30 around digital would look a lot more attractive.

    I've had valves go bad on me several times when playing out.  Replacing a valve isn't that hard but it is annoying, especially when you need to figure out which valve it is.  The metal cages around them on modern amps make it more difficult though.

    The other problem with valve amps is that you tend to use them with pedals.  That means patch cables on the pedalboard can go, although that's better since I stopped using solderless cables.  TPDT switches fail as well.  If the effects are in the modeller you avoid that problem.  Whatever the momentary switches are on digital gear are, they are a lot more reliable than TPDT switches.  I don't think I've ever had one fail.

    The biggest thing though is the sound out front.   The first time I saw a Kemper was in 2012.  I'd seen the same band in the same venue the year before.  In 2011, the guitarist was using a conventional amp, while he used a Kemper in 2012.  The sound out front in the house with the Kemper was far better.  I used a Line 6 Pod live once or twice 20 odd years ago.  I got told by a guy who used to guitar tech for bands on the road that the sound out front was better with the Pod than with my amp mic'd.  I went back to an amp at that point because I was struggling to hear myself on stage. Now I've got a decent FRFR active speaker I don't think I've played live with an amp since before the pandemic.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Danny1969Danny1969 Frets: 12881

    From a sound point of view all you can do is trust your ears. If it sounds good to you and inspires you the that's what matters as that will come through in your playing. 

    Reliability wise, well I repair electronic equipment professionally and god knows I've put enough repairs on here to illustrate this. Don't be fooled that modern SMPS modellers is modern a leap in reliability, it really isn't and in some cases the cases the SMPS in a modeller will fail before the valves in a well designed valve amp will. 


    www.2020studios.co.uk 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 4reaction image Wisdom
  • NerineNerine Frets: 3168
    I’ve used the top end of both fairly extensively. 

    I don’t think the “conveniences” of digital are as superior to valve amps as is made out. 

    I don’t think valve amps or analogue gear is unreliable at all. I’ve gigged literally thousands of times with a valve amp and I can’t recall an issue. 

    I don’t think valve amps sound FAR superior to digital solutions but they do sound better and a mic’d cab sounds better than an IR. 

    I don’t think valve amps are “inconsistent” night to night. Especially if you have something dealing with the IR side of things such as a Suhr RLIR, Ox or Two Notes setup. If anything I find it easier to get a sound in a room with a valve amp when used in this way. 

    I don’t think valve amps are much more hassle to carry around than a digital system with an FRFR monitor. 




    Whilst I do absolutely believe digital solutions sound good, I think there is a lot of guff chatted about valve amps as a way to help justify the switch by people that have made it. 

    I feel people do tend to justify their switch when talking about it. I think that says a lot, does it not?? 


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 5reaction image Wisdom
  • LewyLewy Frets: 5258
    edited September 2024
    Having gone from valve amps to digital, and then recently trying a valve amp again and not particularly enjoying it, I conclude that I actually don't like the "amp in the room" sound and experience that much at all, and in fact what I really like - and which makes me feel most comfortable when playing - is the sound of a well mic'd amp with a bunch of post-cab stereo fx. Having got used to the sound of a guitar speaker going through fx rather than fx going through a guitar speaker, I'm now quite sensitive to the difference. That's practically only really available to me in the digital realm. All of the other pros and cons are rendered moot.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • I’m lazy and, thankfully, utterly happy with Quad Cortex. It’s terrific and does all I will ever need. I had Helix and liked it then moved to Kemper which sounded great but was a pain to work with (for me). QC is so simple and sounds so good. I can’t imagine ever going back to valves and pedals. 
    Trading feedback info here

    My band, Red For Dissent
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • VoxmanVoxman Frets: 5947
    edited September 2024
    Digital for home and digital for gigging are entirely different.

    At home you have all the time in the world to play with everything and wade through heavily menu driven devices. You can indulge yourself in tweaking all the nuances of amp, cab & mic settings and only minimal floor control is needed.

    In a live gigging situation it's completely different. All the nuances about modelling accuracy, IR's, setting tweaks, cab models, mic type & positioning all, for the most part, largely go out the window in a band mix. What you need are some good core tones - a good clean, crunch, & distortion, with a decent reverb, delay, compressor and modulation where needed.  All those distortion effects that you think sound so different at home will all begin to sound very samey live, ditto amp models etc. And patches that sound great at home will often sound pants in a live mix because live your tone is in the mids.

    What you need on stage is functionality, excellent floor control, a clear display, and a good selection of real knobs/selectors that allow you to select an amp or effect model and tweak in seconds, with fast easy access to a tuner and a volume boost for solo's.  There really isn't much around that does this.  All the 'big name' MFX such as Helix, Quad Cortex, Boss GT1000/GX100 etc can sound great, but take ages to set-up and aside from a few knobs are 95% menu driven which makes them a potential nightmare on stage.

    Out of all the current options out there, for live gigging you really want something like the Boss ME90 because it's laid out like a conventional pedal board with real knobs and selectors, no menu's, and has fast easy to use footswitches.  It has a dozen of the AIRD amp/cab models from the GT1000 and a load of quality Boss effects.  If it wasn't for one serious shortfall, I'd buy one for gigging myself but that shortfall - lack of patch naming - is a complete killer for me. LED numbers for patches went out with the arc.  I play mostly covers and I set up patches in set-list song order where I don't have to tap dance and I can move seamlessly from one patch to another. And if there's a song order change, I can find it easily.   In a 32 plus set list I'm probably only using 7 or 8 different patches so many are duplicates, but it's a fast easy approach for gigging.  I just can't do that with the ME90, which is a real shame.

    I've tried so many different MFX over the years and none of the 'modern' mfx work for me in the way that I want. Whilst my Pod Go is compact, light and can sound great, it's again heavily menu driven and it simply has too many options re amps, cabs, mic types and placement positions. Great fun at home, just no good for me live other than if I'm going through eg a house amp.  For this I set it up for use in stomp mode (akin to a traditional pedal board but without fast easy access to real knobs) within a single patch where amp/cab models are turned off and I put the Pod Go through the fx return or through front end, clean channel.  In this mode it's great and it's what I take where I need to travel light on tube/train and am using a house amp. Unfortunately the PSU is utter crap & I've replaced the Line 6 unit with something a bit more gig worthy.

    The only mfx that works for me on stage are old tech Vox Tonelab SE and LE units that are built like tanks with long, thick gig worthy power cables that have a mid cable on/off switch transformer and a standard 13 amp plug (no ugly, awkward 'wall-wart'). Essentially, all amps & fx and (on the SE) cab models can be selected via real selector knobs and there are real knobs to tweak everything quickly on the fly. No IR capability, limited amp/cab/fx options, and you can't play them through a computer without a separate audio interface, but they still sound excellent on stage and the clever use of a 12AX7 valve as a power valve makes them sound & feel surprisingly valve-like.  I either put these through FOH or through FRFR powered speakers. 

    There have been some other MFX that caught on to the 'real knobs' concept including the Zoom G11 (which once you get past the Fischer Price look and ignore what are probably the worst factory pre-sets ever created) is actually a pretty good gigging MFX. Where Zoom went wrong was its ridiculous pricing that killed it.  Another surprisingly good mfx is the Valeton GP200 that has (similar to the Zoom G11) dedicated amp controls.  But it's still too heavily menu driven and whilst it has patch naming, the fooswitches can't be named.  This means that in stomp mode they are labelled ABCD and you have no idea of what you've programmed them to kick in unless you have an incredible memory or put labels on!  And even then the same footswitch would have to do the same thing in every patch.  Hardly flexible, wholly unintuitive and again (for me) useless on stage.  

    So, yes, going digital for gigging has advantages but also a lot of disadvantages and disappointments if you don't do your research properly to ensure the mfx unit you buy will do what you want, in the way that you want, live.  And whatever you buy, be prepared for compromises.  Manufacturers are wonderful at cramming tons in and telling you what it can do, but it's what these can't do that you need to get your head around too. 


    I started out with nothing..... but I've still got most of it left (Seasick Steve)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 9reaction image Wisdom
  • WazmeisterWazmeister Frets: 10319
    @Voxman - brilliant post mate.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • WazmeisterWazmeister Frets: 10319
    edited September 2024
    For me personally, the issue isnt the modeller - they are all pretty good in their own way. Its the following;

    1.) The Learning Curve - I found myself having to learn a completely new ‘language’, understand frequencies more, understand multiplE outputs etc ectc.

    2.) This is the BIG one for me - the modeller is only as good as what you are playing it through. I personally think direct into a PA is never as good, anD that you still need decent foldback.

    - DXR10s sound good clean, but more digital when the profilE is driven.
    - Red Sound were easily thE most natural’ I tried.
    - My Zilla cab (with an amp before it, naturally) worked VERY well, esp with the Kemper.

    3.) Out of all of them, i actually preferred the Kemp (with built in amp) for sound, although the Fractal won for fx, and Helix for ease of use.

    4.) All this means, and especially point 2 above, that modelling live for me actually meant;

    a. More stuff to carry live
    b. More stuff to learn anD more complex
    c. Hence, more expense

    So roughly on price, Kemper Power plus footswitch and Red Sound speaker at the time = around £2500.

    There’s a lot of great sounding amps outthere for that kinda money.

    YMMV.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 2reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.