Bit of a silly question maybe but I wonder if I'm missing anything.
My band is in the process of finishing up what we always said was an EP of four songs.
Because we're a doom band the runtime of the EP is around 45 minutes, and because it has turned out better than we expected there are now noises being made about calling it an album instead.
I'm a bit on the fence about the suggestion. From a writing perspective, I personally want an album to have some degree of coherence and flow that I don't really expect from an EP, especially for doom where vibe is such an important elementof the overall thing. When planning the EP we didn't think too much about what the record as a whole was saying, we just chose our collective favourite tracks by voting and then sequenced them for best flow, so I have some reservations about calling it an album, even if practically nobody else is ever likey to care!
However, is there some element I'm missing here? Would there be a benefit to putting out an album rather than an EP in terms of stuff like Spotify profile, eg?
Thoughts and suggestions welcome :-)
Comments
It's album length, but 4 tracks says EP to me.
Probably no help at all, sorry.
I have albums with sides in the 16-18 minute region.
45 minutes makes it an album, as EPs are classed at 25-30 minutes.
And then there's Reign In Blood with a runtime of 28.55...
Not that I actually miss vinyl, just that it made things clear.
They have a number of albums with only 4 tracks, the shortest total runtime of these is 40:23, the longest 87:21.
Their debut F# A# only had 2 tracks but with a combined runtime of 38:22 it was classed as an album.
Another 2 track release, Slow Riot for New Zero Kanada, was classed as an EP as it was 28:36.
It seems to come down to runtime rather than track numbers. Under or over 30 minutes.
EDIT: but again we have Reign In Blood at 28:55
In my view 45 mins is an album without question.
LP is literally "Long Play" because it was the format for when you have more than 22-ish minutes of music
Pink Floyd's Animals and Wish You Were Here both have 5, and one on Animals is only 1.5 mins. Noone's arguing that those are EPs
Trading feedback here
As for the fact that, for you it’s 4 tracks that don’t belong together in terms of having the cohesion of an album, there are two ways of looking at it.
There are albums like The Holy Bible by Manic Street Preachers that have a very identifiable musical and lyrical theme running through it, which helps to make it what it is. Like a singular statement.
Then you have, say, Jazz by Queen, which a right old mix of styles that have nothing linking them except that they’re on the same album, and that works as a collection of ‘Look at all the different things we can do’ kind of thing.
I wouldn’t say either was better, but the former feels more like a piece of considered art, maybe, the latter more just a band doing its various things but…neither is the ‘right’ way.
Ornette Coleman's Free Jazz album is one continuous piece of music that fades out at the end of side 1 and back in again at the start of side 2. Probably the best bit if I'm honest