It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Formerly TheGuitarWeasel ... Oil City Pickups ... Oil City Blog 7 String.org profile and message
In the case of power stations a power surge is just as problematic as shortage. Mischeif costs money - it's not all terrorists or disgruntled employees.
As for stuff all being connected to the same networks, IT people in massive companies like to collate their logging information on one repository and have unified user interfaces... in the days before twitter the fridge at one place had it's own email account.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
No IT problem will ever be solved with a "big bang approach" - it will take years and you get paid most in the jobs that simply test your patience the most, so learn to be patient and live comfortably.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
In high assurance environments (e.g. Nuclear Power Stations) computer monitoring is still read-only - people still turn valves mechanically (with umpteen double checks etc), not necessarily manually, they can be servo assisted & remote, but not computer controlled because getting the assurance levels needed would be nigh on impossible.
</nerd>
Feedback