It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
And that's the magic and mystery of those three dots. If you stop the sum at any finite point, say
1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + ... + 1/32768
then, indeed, you won't get 2.
But you get closer and closer to 2 as you include more terms, and the ellipsis (...) is a mathematical short-hand for saying that 2 is the number that this sum is heading towards.
You cannot literally add infinitely many numbers together, so this is the best way to ascribe a meaning/value to an infinite sum.
See what I did there?
I'll get me coat.
Had a hexahedronical ball.
When doubled, its weight
Plus its volume, times 8,
Was two thirds of four fifths of fuck all.
I think they mostly do Strats and Teles and a few basses, but might be best to go for a Classic Vibe or Vintage Modified as they are substantially better guitars
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic
you are of course correct. however you're also not.
in mathematics when we talk of infinite series, we always mean 'limit'. so when i say
1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ...
what i actually mean is
'which is the smallest number which cannot be exceeded by this series?'
or equivalently 'what is the limit of this infinite series?'
this series is said to 'converge to 2', and so we say 'the limit of this series as it continues off to infinity is 2' because we can actually get as close to 2 as we like.. so actually the 'dot dot dot' notation is unanimously taken to mean 'the limit as x tends to infinity of the sum from n=1 to x of 1/(2^n)' but i didn't write that and neither do mathematicians because there's no need... we all know what we're talking about. limits.
so how fascinating is it that the series
1 + 1/2^2 + 1/3^2 + 1/4^2 + 1/5^2 + ... = PI SQUARED OVER 6 ?????????
this is the inverse squared series. the Basel problem back in the day was 'what is the limit of the infinite inverse squares series?' because it was used in physics but german physicists got tired of approximating it using that sum and they wanted to know what the limit is in some kind of closed form. and euler came along with a beautiful and very unconventional but relatively simple proof that the limit is exactly pi ^ 2 over 6.... so this series can not exceed that precise value. what the fuck is pi doing here? well i dont know. maths.
*The decent ones mind, not the cheap value filth, which are neither sausages or edible
Twisted Imaginings - A Horror And Gore Themed Blog http://bit.ly/2DF1NYi
Pi ? and can I have custard with that, please ? :-B
more to the point defining one unresolvable number in terms of another unresolvable number !
I think all this points a finger in the direction of a fundamental misconception at the heart of our understanding of maths.
Crack the intrigue and paradoxes and maybe you have the next layer of understanding of the reality which the language maths describes ?
(maybe we don't have the full alphabet / lexicon yet?)
It would be interesting to come back and view the progress in this, in say 500 years time, once computing and algorithmic power has come of age and is roped in to enhance our conceptual understanding, rather than build reality based on weird and almost prehistoric approximations as we seem want to do now. Really, we are better than that...
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
many numbers are irrational. that doesn't make them unresolvable or mysterious. square root of 2 is irrational, which means if we have a right angle triangle with sides of length 1, then the longest side has length sq(2), which is an irrational number. in fact, if we measure anything in the real world to a very high accuracy, you will find that any measurement will be non-repeating as the real world is not as perfect as mathematicians describe... so irrational numbers are everywhere.
the mystery here with the infinite sum is how the inverse squared series, if we take finitely many terms of ths series (making it resolvable) then it will be always under pi^2/6. however, i am saying mystery but it's not really a mystery to any mathematician who has read and understood the proof... but it still is.
however this is a very small thing when we compare it to some of the most beautiful results in mathematics. another one of my favourites is the fact that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_identity
(euler's identity) here we have an irrational number e which related to exponential growth and another irrational number pi, and also we have a complex identity called i which is defined as the 'imaginary number' used in complex analysis, defined mathematically as sq(-1). if we raised e to the power i*pi, we get fucking -1, an integer. AN INTEGER.
A FUCKIN INTEGER
wanna see the most beautiful relationship in mathematics?
wait... the fuck is this? ok so there are two huge symbols here. one on the left, means 'SUM 1/n^s from n=1 to n=infinity', and one on the right, meaning 'take PRODUCT from p= 2 to p= infinity, where we ONLY RUN OVER PRIME NUMBERS'
this is the euler product formula... one of the greatest mindfucks of our generation. a relationship between natural numbers n=1,2,3,4,5... and PRIME NUMBERS, the mysterious p=2,3,5,7,11,13,........... how the fuck are they related like this hmm?
the riemann hypothesis is a million dollar prize problem which extends from euler's product formula, when riemann constructed his Zeta function. there are things very deeply misunderstood about mathematics. im doing a masters in pure maths right now, and every day i leave each lecture thinking... what just happened?