Hey folks
Short version: Had my first sessions in a recording studio, need advice on preparing the stems (EDIT: Sounds like I'm using the term 'stem' wrong according to the replies here. I mean every individual track).
Full details:
I've recorded four tracks for my first EP, and the sessions were in a studio in France (I live in London). So because of the language barrier, I didn't really chat much to the engineer about the process.
I've now received the stems by WeTransfer and want to get them ready for mixing (in the UK). I want to make it as easy as possible for the producer, so wanted to know the key things to do (and not do).
1. Obviously I'm renaming them from the French, so first question is: Is there an industry standard of naming?
2. I want to get rid of some artefacts in them ahead of the mixing. For example, before the vocal of a song begins, you can hear me practising the first note. If I put all the stems into Reaper and cut these bits out, do I just re-export? I want to make sure I'm not degrading the audio by re-exporting.
3. What else should I be doing? I want to maximise my time in mixing, so if there's stuff I can be doing ahead of the sessions, that'd be great.
Cheers
J
________________________________________________
Telecaster American Deluxe, Cornell Romany amp, without the talent to use them properly
Comments
https://www.studiowear.co.uk/ -
https://twitter.com/spark240
Facebook - m.me/studiowear.co.uk
Reddit r/newmusicreview
All tracks need to be named ... like Kick, Snr, RT1 etc
If you have multiple takes in the playlist then add notes so the Mixer / producer knows that. Otherwise they have to click to find out and might not bother.
Reaper is great and generally has the same functionality just might be called a little different.
If unsure don't do anything to the audio other than cutting bits out.
Then I have between 2 and 3 takes of guitar, vox and bass. The guitar and bass seem to have two tracks per take - presumably the amp was mic'd twice, or two amps were mic'd to each guitar?
Nothing's been grouped so far.
________________________________________________
Telecaster American Deluxe, Cornell Romany amp, without the talent to use them properly
So once I've done that, do I just render the project again back out into the individual tracks and I won't be degrading the audio?
________________________________________________
Telecaster American Deluxe, Cornell Romany amp, without the talent to use them properly
Ah, sorry, now I get you. I've been wrongly thinking that a stem was the individual track, but, for example, it'd be all the guitars in one file?
________________________________________________
Telecaster American Deluxe, Cornell Romany amp, without the talent to use them properly
Stems will be all the drums mixed to a stereo pair, all the synths and a stereo pair, all the guitars as a stereo pair etc.
Personally, I do not like mixing from stems.
Give me the multitracks.
As Stuckfast says it is more important to get the correct files you want mixed.
I don't mind getting alternate takes but I ask that I get one Pro Tools session without them if possible, as well as one that has everything in playlists.
It is just faster to work that way.
There is another approach called Brauerising which is worth knowing about too, rather than grouping by instrument you group by frequency range. For instance, bass and bass drum are together.
This isn't a delivery format, but more an approach to mixing. Read about it here:
https://brauerizing.wordpress.com/2014/03/19/brauerizing-a-how-to-guide/
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
________________________________________________
Telecaster American Deluxe, Cornell Romany amp, without the talent to use them properly
________________________________________________
Telecaster American Deluxe, Cornell Romany amp, without the talent to use them properly
(And, I'd hope, supplied along with the clean, unprocessed , take.)
Having watched a bunch of mixes there doesnt seem to be a strict standard but they often include not only the instrument but also the mic used as well.
Use highest possible quality for bounces, at least match what has been supplied, and save as WAV ( obvious really)
Render any midi instrument track, or FX track as a matching audio file, but include the midi, in case the mixer / producer wants to get creative or re-arrange the track, and I would include a rough mix, from the same multitracks to give an idea of the balance I was looking for, making clear that this is just for reference.
You are paying for experience, and an amount of artistic input here, so it can only help to provide as much as is needed to get your desired outcome.
Save some time maybe, by editing out stuff, but be aware you may be editing IN something undesirable-ie clicks and pops, or just obvious changes to an audio track, strip silence has a threshold, and Reaper has fades to edits, but they can be removing ambience from a track that is noticeable, better to let the mixer deal with it his own way maybe.
STEMS, are usually grouped stereo mixes, and can be a useful step in the path to a finished mix, but as a mixer, I would always prefer the raw source file to work from, but that doesn't include alternate takes of every track unless I really want them.
________________________________________________
Telecaster American Deluxe, Cornell Romany amp, without the talent to use them properly