Baritone or not - need help understanding!

What's Hot
2»

Comments

  • SporkySporky Frets: 28508
    edited April 2017
    Wide compared to a lot of wind instruments, but about the same as a cello and much less than a piano.

    It was more about comparison with other instruments that come in various sizes and tuning - the brass and violin families for instance. "Every" other instrument might have been an overstatement on my part. ;)
    "[Sporky] brings a certain vibe and dignity to the forum."
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • LewLew Frets: 1657
    Baritone for most folk will simply mean tuning to B and below.

    However, tuning a standard scale guitar (24.75" - 25.5") to baritone with heavy strings feels and sounds incredibly different to a 27"-30" baritone guitar with lighter strings. Obviously.

    Problems with intonation on standard guitars are *mostly down to shitty setups on shitty guitars *up to a point. Like someone already said yer simply swapping the high E for a low B and taking the G down half a step.

    13s are perfect for me. If ya like 10s in E it's the same set. D'addario do it with a 56 or 62. Whatever suits. And with a wound 3rd which I can't be without. But I know some perverts use a plain 3rd for Baritone tuning. Ugh. Plain 3rds are wrong no matter the tuning though ;-)


     


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • hopkinshopkins Frets: 0
    Lew said:
    Plain 3rds are wrong no matter the tuning though ;-)
    Damn right!
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Is this applicable for acoustics too or are there further considerations?
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 72490
    Lew said:

    13s are perfect for me. If ya like 10s in E it's the same set. D'addario do it with a 56 or 62. Whatever suits. And with a wound 3rd which I can't be without. But I know some perverts use a plain 3rd for Baritone tuning. Ugh. Plain 3rds are wrong no matter the tuning though ;-)
    I like plain 3rds up to a 17 in a set of 10s, or an 18 in a set of 11s in standard tuning on solidbody guitars, but any heavier than that, or with 11s on any kind of semi-hollow, and it just sounds wrong.

    Is this applicable for acoustics too or are there further considerations?
    In theory it's the same - five of the strings are tuned the same as normal - but the low B often sounds noticeably weaker than the other strings, even if you use a heavy enough gauge.

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • hopkinshopkins Frets: 0
    Is this applicable for acoustics too or are there further considerations?

    Or, if you're asking specifically about the wound G-string in standard tuning, for me it is entirely about acoustics.  I enjoy playing heavy metal rhythm guitar, and this often requires tremolo picking riffs up to the G-string.  I dislike the shrill change in tone when transitioning to a plain string.  I suspect that it may NOT suit those who play a lead-heavy guitar style for the same reason.  (I wonder if any shredders play with a plain D string for this reason?!)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • hopkins said:
     (I wonder if any shredders play with a plain D string for this reason?!)

    I doubt it because any plain string thicker than around .020 has very little attack and quite a dull sound.  The EB Not even slinky set has a .024 plain string (for the 3rd) and when I used to use that set I always replaced it with a thinner string.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • hopkinshopkins Frets: 0
    hopkins said:
     (I wonder if any shredders play with a plain D string for this reason?!)

    I doubt it because any plain string thicker than around .020 has very little attack and quite a dull sound.  The EB Not even slinky set has a .024 plain string (for the 3rd) and when I used to use that set I always replaced it with a thinner string.
    Interesting!  Thanks.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 72490
    guitarfishbay said:

    any plain string thicker than around .020 has very little attack and quite a dull sound.
    I've always found they have that, but also a strange clangy sound, almost like a cracked bell that's out of tune with itself. It's because a very thick plain string can't flex properly, especially for the higher harmonics. I'm not sure if it actually causes false nodes or something - that might not be the correct technical explanation, but it sounds something like that to me.

    Some guitars are worse for bringing it out than others - I've always disliked a plain G on a Rickenbacker with the Toaster pickups, even when it's otherwise quite a light gauge. The ones with the High-Gain pickups are OK up to a normal set of 10s (17 G).

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.