It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
I'm not a big Fender user guy so.....perhaps you can help...
The NO LOAD tone circuit as I understand kicked in when guitar pot was full up on 10 ,below that and the circuit was as normal
1 through to 9 = normal
and 10 = the no load circuit thingy kicks in
is it the same deal with the GREASEBUCKET circuit....full on 10 makes some sort of difference or is the GREASEBUCKET circuit in operation through the full travel of the pot? sort of a thing......
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
The theory is that this prevents the drop in overall output that a subtractive high frequency roll off control normally introduces.
What I don't understand with all these schemes is this…
All the most desirable vintage instruments have perfectly normal simple pot & cap tone controls, and they sound pretty good by all accounts.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Same goes for some recent premium Fender products. In my opinion, the No-Load tone control on the Brown's Canyon / OGRW Telecaster passes too much screechy top end. Changed to a regular CTS A250k and the guitar became usable.
Bypass in the no load but not the GB?