It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
No although some may be made in the same factory. I think the QC on Vintage stuff is higher than on HB. They both represent great value and can easily give an Epiphone a run for its money.
I still have the original V300 mahogany a really good blues acoustic and I back to backed it with similar martin at the time and it was easily as good if not better it has that great warm mahogany top voice for blues.
i had an AVS these are worth getting hold of they were an attempt to move the brand up a notch or two that failed I think on the fact that they were to hard to produce at the price I sold my AV3 for no money but it was a solid take on 336 style hollowed out mahogany body. They were dropped and revamped into the much more expensive fretking range. Worth finding them quality was up as was hardware wood selection fit and finish make no money 2nd hand but great working mans tool.
sound like a fanboy
I got it as a teen going through a pointy phase I then grew out of that pointy phase, but now in my 30's i do miss that guitar and i reckon with a couple of fairly cheap upgrades it could really be something special!
I own a V100 Paradise and have had it in the same room as the Harley Benton equivalent. The Vintage was much better guitar in my opinion.
My V100 has been with me for around 5 years and done hundreds of gigs. Only last week I upgraded to a Gibson which is a better guitar than the vintage, but the Vintage is still a cracking instrument.
Some have Wilkingson pickups ,the cheaper versions often but Vintage have Wilkingson Tuners ,better pickups and trems and bits and bobs that are are good quality as well as Trevs better pickups sometimes .It makes Vintage a known quality package ./not top quality but it all does its job and works .