Has anyone owned a DC30 and an AC30?

What's Hot
ToneControlToneControl Frets: 11928
I've owned 2 AC15s (one with EF86) and an AC10 twin (with EF86)
I got a DC30 clone, then a real DC30

But I've never had an AC30

has anyone owned both, are they so close there'd be no point owning both?
(e.g. I sold the EF86 handwired AC15 because it sounded like a smaller version of the DC30)
0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom

Comments

  • Moe_ZambeekMoe_Zambeek Frets: 3423
    edited October 2017
    I have. I don't think they are *that* similar but you can tell they are blood relations. The DC30 is tighter, brighter / more steely and obviously has the master volume and two channels so I'd more versatile. I found the DC30 to have a faster attack too. However, you dont get that thing that Alnico blues do, that no other speaker really replicates.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DodgeDodge Frets: 1445
    I have.

    I'm not sure I'd choose to own both at the same time, they cover a lot of similar ground.

    The DC30 sounds like a stiffer, harder version of an AC30 - similar sounding, but it's different.  Part of the AC30's charm is that it sounds like it's working really hard to give up the tone.  Matchless is more effortless, more muscular.  Both amps sound incredible.  As posted above, the alnico blues are a big part of the AC30 tone but Matchless also have the mismatched speaker load, the mismatched speaker types and the massive filtering - all of which push the amp tone away from 'classic' AC30.

    I went around the houses when looking for the top-boost tone, I started with AC30's, lusted after and eventually bought a DC30 thinking it was a 'better' Vox, decided it was too loud and heavy and ended up with a smaller Lightning 15 after a long love affair with Cornell amps, played an AC30 again and bought one (Korg UK reissue) and I've ended up with a couple of 60's AC30's.  Full circle, lots of money spent getting back to where I started!

    FWIW - I don't like EF86's in AC30's or DC30's.




    0reaction image LOL 1reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • CabicularCabicular Frets: 2214
    My input is somewhat diminished by the fact that I have Moes old one
    I will echo that it doesn’t really sound like an AC30
    it has its own thing
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DJH83004DJH83004 Frets: 196
    For what it's worth, I still look after a lot of early British amps for various customers and it is getting increasingly difficult to to get hold of EF86s that aren't microphonic these days, whether they be NOS, secondhand or new manufacture.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ToneControlToneControl Frets: 11928
    DJH83004 said:
    For what it's worth, I still look after a lot of early British amps for various customers and it is getting increasingly difficult to to get hold of EF86s that aren't microphonic these days, whether they be NOS, secondhand or new manufacture.
    Yes, I usually buy a batch of used ones from ebay, and just use the best. Brand new ones are often useless
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • WazmeisterWazmeister Frets: 9568
    Matchless offer a unique feel and sound, imho...

    Ive played a C30 at World Guitars a few times, and the clean channel alone (even at the less desirable lower volumes) sounded epic. 

    I miss my old Lightning too; would buy a head in a flash !
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ecc83ecc83 Frets: 1636

    A small defence of the EF86? The valve is in the first place not really suited as a high gain front end for a guitar amp. Pentodes are inherently noisier than triodes (the 86 actually makes a pretty good triode) and you don't really want ALL that gain in one stage.

    Unless proper attempts to stop it are made, RF will break through. 'Back in the Day' there was not so much RF kit about.

    Microphony. Old hi-fi designs used 'shock mount' construction for valveholders for high gain stages. Does the AC X? And again, triodes are more suited as front ends! In any case, putting a speaker capable of 120dBSPL+ with stacks of gain behind it inches from a valve (any valve!) is bloody silly! But peeps WANT combos!

    Reliability: The Artisans, 15 &30 W uses an 86 but at very low gain just to get 'pentode sound' . I think I had ONE die in 3 years?

    Dave.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ToneControlToneControl Frets: 11928
    I love the Ef86 channels. Once I find a quiet one, it works fine for years
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 72418
    Dodge said:

    The DC30 sounds like a stiffer, harder version of an AC30 - similar sounding, but it's different.  Part of the AC30's charm is that it sounds like it's working really hard to give up the tone.  Matchless is more effortless, more muscular.  Both amps sound incredible.  As posted above, the alnico blues are a big part of the AC30 tone but Matchless also have the mismatched speaker load, the mismatched speaker types and the massive filtering - all of which push the amp tone away from 'classic' AC30.

    I went around the houses when looking for the top-boost tone, I started with AC30's, lusted after and eventually bought a DC30 thinking it was a 'better' Vox, decided it was too loud and heavy and ended up with a smaller Lightning 15 after a long love affair with Cornell amps, played an AC30 again and bought one (Korg UK reissue) and I've ended up with a couple of 60's AC30's.  Full circle, lots of money spent getting back to where I started!

    FWIW - I don't like EF86's in AC30's or DC30's.
    I haven't owned any of them, but the Matchless I've heard which I like the best is also the Lightning. I haven't like the bigger models as much exactly because they sound too bold and strident compared to an AC30 - the Lightning didn't. I still prefer Voxes in general though.

    I also dislike EF86s in this type of amp.

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DJH83004DJH83004 Frets: 196
    ecc83 said:

    Microphony. Old hi-fi designs used 'shock mount' construction for valveholders for high gain stages. 

    Dave.

    In actual fact Dave some of the early combos such as the Selmer Zodiac, did have the white rubber mounted pre-amp valve bases, sadly they tend to harden with age and are not as effective. They also had the pre-amp chassis at the top of the cab with lots of metalwork around it, and with the power amp at the bottom of the cab, to help isolate the pickup from the mains transformer, so some thought did go into the design back then, and don't forget the line of tone push-buttons straight out of a radiogram !   
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ecc83ecc83 Frets: 1636

    Ooo! I remember those Selmers! Always thought it was the very best way to make a valve combo. Put the heavy PA traff stuff at the bottom of the cab and have an umbilical up to the lightweight pre amp.

    Sadly, costafortune to do now. In fact I have a valve pre amp so made and was going to power it with 20V DC and use a chip/MOSFET 300V converter. One of 100 things I shall never do now!

    Dave.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 72418
    ecc83 said:

    Ooo! I remember those Selmers! Always thought it was the very best way to make a valve combo. Put the heavy PA traff stuff at the bottom of the cab and have an umbilical up to the lightweight pre amp.

    Sadly, costafortune to do now.

    Actually Fender made the Excelsior like that (in China) very recently. Unfortunately, unlike Selmer they didn't put any connectors at either end of the 'shower hose' between the two, so they are permanently connected together and a bit of a pain to work on!

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ecc83ecc83 Frets: 1636
    ICBM said:
    ecc83 said:

    Ooo! I remember those Selmers! Always thought it was the very best way to make a valve combo. Put the heavy PA traff stuff at the bottom of the cab and have an umbilical up to the lightweight pre amp.

    Sadly, costafortune to do now.

    Actually Fender made the Excelsior like that (in China) very recently. Unfortunately, unlike Selmer they didn't put any connectors at either end of the 'shower hose' between the two, so they are permanently connected together and a bit of a pain to work on!


    Oh! Tw*ts. I still have a couple of pristine octal line sockets with covers if anyone has the need?


    Dave.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.