It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
HarrySeven - Intangible Asset Appraiser & Wrecker of Civilisation. Searching for weird guitars - so you don't have to.
Forum feedback thread. | G&B interview #1 & #2 | https://www.instagram.com/_harry_seven_/
"...After all the guff I hear on the net from dealers and some of the guess-work from couch experts, I prefer to sell this guitar to a musician who can come to view with his own Gibson expert, to examine and appraise the guitar. I am sick of dealers wasting my time. Some are like vultures."
Everyone should have their own Gibson expert - can you buy them from Pets At Home?
HarrySeven - Intangible Asset Appraiser & Wrecker of Civilisation. Searching for weird guitars - so you don't have to.
Forum feedback thread. | G&B interview #1 & #2 | https://www.instagram.com/_harry_seven_/
According to the dictionary, providence means "the protective care of God or of nature as a spiritual power."
If that's not worth £50 grand by itself, I don't know what is.
1) has it been owned by J Miles ? - he mentions he has verification of that fact - I recall JM playing such a guitar in the 70's when he was acquiring some TV and radio time
2) is it a 59 LP - far harder to answer - obviously a few changes have taken place and could well reflect wear n tear by regular use that is not unusual - But beyond by ability to confirm that it is a genuine 59
3) then assuming 1 + 2 are kosher then you need to place a value on it - fair to say a 59 LP used and played by JM will have little additional value compared to many more iconic 'guitar hero's'
Just a gut feeling - but based on its originality, changes and other issues then it appears to be in somewhat of a no mans land - The serious investors would rather spend 6 digits on an original piece that is 'original' condition as against 50K on a 'molestered' model - Whereas a player can buy either a good 59 reissue or indeed an early 50's rebuild that @jumping@shadows builds for far less - still vintage criteria and probably a superior playing example
http://www.mylespaul.com/threads/59-burst-in-uk-£50k.361790/
http://www.mylespaul.com/threads/gibson-les-paul-standard-guitar-1957-john-miles-owned.109798/
Yes - we discussed it almost exactly two years ago and,yes, I gave the same anecdote then as well. It was also pointed out that John is still active on the Tyneside scene and this guitar is in Essex so it's almost certainly not him selling it.
* Said hello and stood quite near him for a while.
as for the value - again my assumption that a fan has purchased it, maybe when JM had a larger following than today, yet struggles to obtain any inflated value today for a guitar played by 'yesterdays hero' - That isn't meant to be nasty - I suspect that if it was just a non original 50's LP with no inflated 'artist' value, then with a price in single digits, then the likes of @jumping@shadows could buy it and turn it into a players grade glorious example
I stated earlier that a market exists for an LP worth 6 digits amongst serious collectors - equally a market exists for conversions from the likes of @jumping@shadows - I don't see much of a market for a guitar similar to this JM 59 LP at anything around 50K
He cannot even answer the critical questions for any potential buyer.
What year was the donor guitar?
No idea mate.
Well....have you checked the butt end for Trapeze holes?
Nope.
Which Luthier did the Conversion?
No idea. It might have been Dick. Or a dick.
Time wasting buyers are annoying. But not as annoying as sellers who are time wasting jokers.
and they will be my last.
les pauls are the future.
and les pauls of the past.
to live without my les paul,
would be impossible to do.
in this worls of troubles.
my les paul pulls me through.
(hope i got the right bloke)
It’s tedious that every time a Dick Knight retop pops up (which are so distinctive and identifiable in their inaccuracies vs stock ‘50s such as the infamous centre seam separation, free hand painted S/N, wonky pickup placement, cavity routing, top figure etc), there’s a hot debate over whether it’s a real Burst- it’s wilful ignorance on the part of the seller.
I was recently brought an alleged ‘58 Burst with original DW PAFs (in itself impossible as DW’s came in ‘59), and it took about 4 seconds to identify it as a total and crude scratch build, and while the owner gave me the whole ‘well I’ve had this looked at by experts, and bought it in the ‘70s’ yada yada, when I laid out ‘53, ‘55, ‘60 and ‘68 Les Pauls next to it and demonstrated unless Gibson decided to dispense with all period templates, build methods and finishing schedules when they built his, it was indeed a ringer..
He had little choice but to agree with the hard evidence of organised, demonstrable and empirical knowledge, but seeing as he acquired it in lieu of a small debt and I paid him £7k for the PAFs, he took it pretty well, and admitted it had always seemed wishful thinking to believe it were the real deal.