It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/general-binding-rules-small-sewage-discharge-to-a-surface-water
Reading this it looks like:
- you can keep your exisiting septic tank if you apply for a consent, but they are unlikely to give you one (and I believe that, they refuse us all sorts of 'fair' things). You then become liable for the septic tank meeting that consent.
- you can drain the existing septic to a soakaway, but you need land and they have a track record of refusing soakaway applications. This removes the discharge to watercourse aspect as it now spills all over the floor. Nice one Centurion!
- you can install a package plant, designed to treat all flows, and continue to discharge to watercourse, without a permit. But you still can't pollute. I take it this option means they will be unlikely to sample you as the design volumes have been checked out beforehand. This is where using a company like WPL will benefit as they understand loading rates and per capita contributions.
...but still no discharge criteria (unless you apply for a permit). I would still consider a septic tank a 'package treatment plant'. Just because it has no moving parts doesn't mean it's not removing organic load. The tighter the discharge criteria, the bigger the plant needs to be (££), with no effluent standard to meet it will be a hydraulic retention device, which is the same as a septic tank.
Sounds a bit shoddy, the way they are putting this legislation out.