It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Something I often wonder is why guitar seems to focus so much on pentatonic scales when keyboard instruments don't. I don't know about other instruments, I would take a guess that they don't. So why guitar?
He's planned it out very well and it's impressive how it's all integrated - the fretboard diagrams, his playing and how he's able to talk through it without messing up!
For many people on here this is probably baby stuff, easy as falling off a log. For me, I sort of half-know most of what he's talking about, but in a very confused way. I haven't seen it so clearly explained before.
Thanks for posting that.
He's probably a really good teacher too...
The reason you use the pentatonic specifically? Only 5 notes and (usually) they all fit the song. If you're playing a basic 3 chord song in C maj (e.g. C, F and G maj chords), a C maj pentatonic will fit over the whole tune. Might sound a bit dull, but will work fine. This makes it a great starting place to learn to improvise from. Could you play a C maj scale instead? Yes, but 1. more notes so a more complicated pattern to learn and 2. unlike the pentatonic, not all notes in the major scale will work over all chords in that key.
Once comfortable playing a C pentatonic over the whole C, F and G tune, you can expand and begin to play F and G pentatonics over the respective chords. Same basic shapes, no *wrong* notes, a great way to begin to learn to improvise and move with the changes.
So... if you nail the 5 basic pentatonic boxes you can pretty much play over anything, in any key, anywhere on the neck and follow the changes hence it being a popular way to teach and learn.
Other instruments do use pentatonics as a way to teach basic improvising but possibly spend less time on it because of the linear way they play scales. On sax, for example, there's only 1 way to play a C maj pentatonic scale. Learn that 1 shape and that's it. Again, on guitar, there are numerous ways. This is possibly why guitarists seem to live in pentatonic world more so than other instruments - it simply takes longer to learn the many ways of doing the same thing.
A pretty generalised summary but that's my interpretation as someone who plays sax and guitar.
Keyboard and other instruments are very much taught from a classical angle. I'd imagine classical guitar lessons focus as little on pentatonic scales as keyboard.
But with rock and blues music it wasn't the same formal education, it was just learning how to play be music they wanted to play. Pentatonic is easy because it takes out ambiguous notes and has fewer notes to learn so would be appealing to someone who just wanted to play, not train for years.
So when rock guitar lessons became more formal they focused on what was being learned already.
I'd personally discourage seeing so much importance in pentatonic scales as I think a lot of people just stay there in an easy comfort zone where everything can sound bland.
A: learn where all the notes are on the neck
B: learn what intervals between notes build scales, triads, arpeggios etc
c: make is sound more interesting by bending, sliding, use of harmonics, double stops etc
The first thing I do when teaching people who can play a bit is steer them away from caged and pentatonic shapes because I want them to think of the notes when they play, not the shapes.
That's not to say the good ol pent isn't useful, it is .... but the reason a lot of players sound samey is in my view due to playing shapes rather then thinking about how a given note will sound over the song behind it.
Plus thinking of notes, scales and intervals translates to any instrument
A lot of guitar solos are basically just snippets of scale exercises.
How about this - come up with the solo using a keyboard and then play it on guitar. Even better, since keyboards have their own habitual patterns, use one of those midi controllers where it just has loads of identical pads or buttons and write the solo on that.
Ebay mark7777_1
Some might find the info in the video to be simple stuff, not so for me. I intend to take it easy, one step at a time. With the hope that one day I will know what I am doing when playing guitar.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
I thought it was a clear video and took me about as far with CAGED as I've ever got - understanding the idea but not following it up with a lot of effort. But for the right person there is hours, days, weeks of learning in there.
I personally have never used CAGED but that’s probably because I bypassed it in my own development as a player. If I were a guitar teacher I’d seriously look into it as a tool to help practise technique; but not to the exclusion of modes, and certainly not to the exclusion of creating music away from the comfortable guitar shapes.
Supportact said: [my style is] probably more an accumulation of limitations and bad habits than a 'style'.
1) CAGED is in tonal alphabetical sequence/ order (albeit backwards)
2) it makes a word
There aren’t many words in alphabetical order. and just imagine that if whoever came before Beethoven and came up with music theory and named the notes, had used T U V W X Y Z instead , then the concept of CAGED would not work.
I.e. If they memorize certain shapes and patterns they can jump to places on the fret board that they won't know what will sound like in advance but at least will be in key.
Isn't it better to hear the melody in your head that you actually want that isn't limited by technical ability and doesn't rely on serendipity?