Odd 'Martin'

What's Hot
JerkMoansJerkMoans Frets: 8794
More eBay fun.

Said to be a 'Late 70's Martin Shenandoah'.

But, AFAIK, the Shenandoah jobbies didn't start till the early to mid 80's.  No problem - vendor could have his dates wrong.  But then the ad text explains it's a laminate back - v. honestly.  Yet the quoted serial number translates to 1968.

Thoughts?  Snide?  Or a weird limited run?  Price seems astonishingly low if it is anything like what it purports to be, which I suppose should be a red flag, and no bids...
Inactivist Lefty Lawyer
0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom

Comments

  • ICBMICBM Frets: 72455
    Logo is wrong - they actually say 'Shenandoah' where the Est. 1833 bit is on the Martin logo.

    Given that it's not a 1968 D28 either for many reasons, I would say some sort of fake.

    The tuners look like more modern Pings or similar as well, although it's possible they could have been changed - I think I can just see old screw holes under a couple of them, but the pic resolution is too poor to tell for sure. (Another red flag given the quality of modern phone cameras.)

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • BingManBingMan Frets: 35
    bridge looks goofy too... it's the wrong shape and think these are supposed to be ebony too. This looks more like rosewood but on closer inspection looks to be a lighter wood that has been stained darker
    i'd give it a big old swerve 

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • JerkMoansJerkMoans Frets: 8794
    Consider it widely swerved :D 
    Inactivist Lefty Lawyer
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • moremore Frets: 230
    edited March 2021
    The Shenandoah were Martin copies of more expensive models . So laminate back and sides is corect . But the number is wrong . The first number would be the model that it is a copy of , D28 followed by 32 , that is the number used for all Shenandoahs . 
      The brige looks wrong . Martin bridges are shaped , this one is just an oblong block .  
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • StuckfastStuckfast Frets: 2417
    Strangely, the auction ended without any bids.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 72455
    Stuckfast said:
    Strangely, the auction ended without any bids.
    That is surprising. There’s usually at least one optimist with these things...

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • boogiemanboogieman Frets: 12383
    That looks very like a Goshi acoustic I had at one time, but I think there were loads of similar Japanese Martin copies around in the 60s and 70s. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.