It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Treat me like an absolute idiot on this subject, for I know nothing
If I was starting a small business (sole trader)
selling books, and I introduced 5,000 of my own books into the business
that I'd accrued over the past 20 years. Would they be classified as
stock that could be claimed against, i.e. pre-trade expenses ?
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
*An Official Foo-Approved guitarist since Sept 2023.
*An Official Foo-Approved guitarist since Sept 2023.
Its the market value that's screwing my head up.
I'd have thought I was selling them at market value, therefore, I'm finding it strange to claim the same market value for asset transfer. I need a lay down
If you over value the stock the tax man will need you to prove why or ask you to pay the extra he would have seen in profits had a realistic value been applied.
That's cleared the mist
Yes, I would be introducing more books, so that makes it easier to value the existing books I will be transferring. There are specialist books included, at least 5% with a collectors value.
If I was to make the analogy with guitars, and I was transferring a personal extensive guitar collection, but holding back the more vintage stuff. Would the taxman raise an eyebrow if I sold 'my' vintage guitars on a personal level, but continued to sell the vintage guitars I secured for the business, through the business ?
The perception I have is the tax man shoots first and asks question later.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
I'm investigating the viability of the model first, once I've established a few basic FAQ's, then I can make an informed choice whether to sell an extensive marketable collection privately, or turn it into a business idea and seek more stock. Through sites like this, the UK business forum and others, I should be able to obtain those core answers. If then, I like the idea, I'll flog a few thousands worth privately, and then consult an oracle. As its not going to turn me into Dicky Branson or Mr Trump, I need to watch my pennies carefully.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
I have an appointment with the bank next month, I was hoping to look a little less like a rabbit in the middle of the road before I got there. lol
I don't require any start-up costs (apart from consulting an accountant) as I already have the stock, premises, computer systems...and slave labour (kids are great when they need a summer job during uni)
Its convincing the tax man the two are not linked. Especially when private sales will be via Gumtree and be concluded with cash. I think ultimately, that's my main concern.
Back onto the subject of guitars.
A very good friend of mine has been de-gassing his guitar collection, including a couple of 70s Fenders and a collection of R7-R0 Gibson's. He's paid a substantial amount of cash into his bank, and was then contacted by HMRC. His still dealing with them nearly a year later. They want to see all his original invoices and can't seem to understand that he bought many of them through gumtree using cash in the first place. Its becoming a nightmare because there are connotations of money laundering aimed at him.
Blimey, the tax man would have a field day on here !
Also, there is a lot of info to be had from Companies House website, and also all the banks will be able to supply you with a lot of free advice once you set up a business account.
See what is available from your local chamber of commerce too. They often can supply a lot of good free info.
That won't satisfy the Revenue. One of the "badges of trade", the things that separate the private transaction from the business transaction is quantity.
See Rutledge v CIR, where a taxpayer claimed that a million toilet rolls were not purchased for business purposes or invetment, but for private use.
What you also need to understand is that just because you may be in the right, if the Revenue come after you it may cost you a packet to defend your case, especially if they think you've not been up-front with them.
Along with what everyone else has advised in the thread, I've taking it on-board and have emailed a couple of local accountancy practices for quotes on initial advice and on-going support in my first year