So, I've got a Fender Supersonic 60 that has blown a fuse, I think because one of the power valves failed. The amp is from 2009 and still had all the original tubes until I replaced some pre-amp tubes and biased a bit hotter.
Shortly after one of the power tubes started making a bad noise so I replaced it with a pretty old JJ that I had spare. The amp was working all right for a bit until I had it pretty cranked and started making noise, that from research, I think was one or the other power tubes failing...
As this is the amps first service I was looking for advice as to if it is worth taking it to a Fender service centre? Or getting an amp tech to check that nothing has gone a miss inside? A full re-tube, bias and fuse replacement? Or just replacing the power tubes, fuse and re-bias?
Cheers
Comments
http://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/57632/
I'm planning to retire there.....how long can you wait?
The Supersonic, like other Fenders, regulates the +/- rails for the op-amps in the unit using a power resistor and zener diode.
These resistors run hotter than they need to if the amp is wired to the wrong voltage.
Worse the high voltage screen supply runs very close to one of the zeners and can (and does) short out due to the insulation being compromised by the heat generated in the zener.
There is a way of rewiring the screen supply directly to the valve sockets to prevent this happening in the future.
A better way would be to use 3 terminal regulators.....
As you can imagine this is beneficial to the long term reliability.
re the Zeners, many Fender valve amps also have stages that employ solid state op-amps, eg for the pre-amp send and switching circuits in the Super Sonic.
The op-amps run of a dual rail supply of +16V / -16V.
To generate this the amp has a dedicated transformer secondary winding that when rectified and smoothed according to the schematic should be about +/- 28V (although will be higher running the amp wired to 230 VAC in the UK), which is way too high for the op-amps.
To reduce this down to +/- 16V Fender use a Zener diode preceded by a resistor. A Zener diode when reverse biased has a fixed voltage drop across it, eg if you use a 16V Zener diode you will get 16V (more of less) across, and in this way a + and - 16 V supplies are generated.
However this method is very wasteful of power as you are not only supplying current to the circuitry in the amp, but also shunting a load of current through the Zener diode.
Assuming no current draw by the circuitry, with a 270 ohm dropping resistor you are sourcing (28-16)/220 = 44 mA of current which will be dissipating around 0.5 W in the resistor and 0.7 W in the Zener.
The Zener dissipation will be reduced a bit by the current draw of the circuitry down to maybe 0.5W.
Not only is this dissipation quite high, it will be made worse by running the amp wired to 230 mains as the voltage drop will be greater.
Zener shunt regulation is easy to implement and generally bullet proof as long as the components chosen can withstand the power dissipation, however it is wasteful.
In contrast a cheap 3-terminal integrated voltage regulator would only be required to source the current delivered to the circuit, so if so was required to deliver 15 mA (typical for 3 op-amps) at 15V from a 30V supply then the dissipation in each regulator would be around 0.225 W, ie under a quarter the waste dissipation in the dropping resistor and Zener diode, and is easily in the capabilities of TO-220 three terminal regulator without heatsinking. .
It's actually more understandable that they would do it this way in a solid-state amp which has a higher-voltage split-rail main power supply anyway… but quite baffling in a valve amp really, when the only LT is the +/- 15V.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
@vertigo88, I managed to find a photo of the last SS60 I looked at, ignore the red circle, (which was the problem with this particular amp), check that the main cable loom going across the printed circuit board is well away from the two large white ceramic resistors and the black zener diodes at the side of them.
http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i457/vertigo888/DSC_0390_zpsxkyyk7sh.jpg
http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i457/vertigo888/DSC_0391_zpscssvivqt.jpg
http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i457/vertigo888/DSC_0392_zpsktn43qaq.jpg
http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i457/vertigo888/DSC_0393_zpsvo3wa8xl.jpg
I've circled the bit I thought look dodgy with red in the first two photos, can anyone tell from looking if this might be the problem? Cheers all
The burnt-looking connections will be the filament supply coming from the transformer, which feed both the valves and the light. The reason they have overheated is probably just because the contact area of the push-connectors used is too small for the relatively high current carried on these, so there is enough resistance to generate significant heat - but that would be increased drastically if the bulb is shorted or if the holder is shorting against the chassis.
In fact, to check it's nothing to do with the filament loom at all, the easiest thing to do is just to temporarily pull off both those connectors. If the amp now still blows the fuse, that's not the cause and it's definitely time for a tech to have a look.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein