THD Univalve

What's Hot
MtBMtB Frets: 922
They were all the rage 15 years or so ago. Was it any good? What would it compare to in today's market? 
0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
«1

Comments

  • simonksimonk Frets: 1467
    Most boring and lifeless amp I've ever owned TBH - couldn't wait to shift it.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 72627
    It was at the beginning of the return to retro-inspired power valve overdrive sounds, after the 80s and 90s preamp-distortion era. The selling point was that it would take any power valve type, so you could use different ones to get different 'flavours'.

    The only problem was that it just sounded slightly differently bland and lifeless no matter what you put in it.

    It did also probably start the craze for 'lunchbox' amps, which is still with us.

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • I really disliked it - I found it clangy and metallic sounding, and it sounded essentially the same regardless of the power tube.

    they were the second coming of the Lord according to the press at the time, too.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • MtBMtB Frets: 922
    "they were the second coming of the Lord according to the press at the time, too."

    ^^^^ Exactly this, I remember reading many of the magazine reports, and GAS'ed for one (out of my price range back then). 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Winny_PoohWinny_Pooh Frets: 7801
    They had such positive press at the time, so basically lying to readers is all I can conclude.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Jesus, they weren't that bad! I've still got mine and rather like it.

    They can be trebly, I find running it at louder settings helps quite a bit. Also maxing the bass control and reduce the attack a bit can warm it up, or even (god forbid) using the tone control on the guitar.
    Link to my trading feedback: http://thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/58787/
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 3reaction image Wisdom
  • MtB said:
    "they were the second coming of the Lord according to the press at the time, too."

    ^^^^ Exactly this, I remember reading many of the magazine reports, and GAS'ed for one (out of my price range back then). 
    I wonder if we'll be saying this about Carr / Lazy J / Louis Electric / Friedman in about 10 years time?

    Amps seem to be more faddy than diets...
    Link to my trading feedback: http://thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/58787/
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 4reaction image Wisdom
  • mrleon83mrleon83 Frets: 191
    I used one for overdubs about 10 years ago ..  was good what was needed and cut through the mix incredibly .. bloody loud too ... 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Never tried either, but the Jet City Picovalve is supposed to be designed by Mr THD and based on the Univalve design. You can probably pick one up for about £100 second hand.
    <space for hire>
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • stickyfiddlestickyfiddle Frets: 27224
    I don't think it's fair to say reviews were lying, but it is true that tastes change, and trends come and go.

    I can totally imagine that, to a jobbing journalist tasked with demoing gear and recording clips to go in a regular magazine, stuff like the Univalve and Cornford Harlequin must've been amazing coming from 20 years of your only options being big loud stuff like JCMs and AC30s. 

    But makers have improved on those ideas and made newer amps since that make them look a bit meh today.
    The Assumptions - UAE party band for all your rock & soul desires
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ICBMICBM Frets: 72627

    I can totally imagine that, to a jobbing journalist tasked with demoing gear and recording clips to go in a regular magazine, stuff like the Univalve and Cornford Harlequin
    To be fair, they do sound better than a Harlequin...

    "Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski

    "Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein

    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • Jesus, they weren't that bad! I've still got mine and rather like it.

    They can be trebly, I find running it at louder settings helps quite a bit. Also maxing the bass control and reduce the attack a bit can warm it up, or even (god forbid) using the tone control on the guitar.
    Exactly my experience...

    I sold it when I bought a Matamp C7...one of their finest hours to my ears. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • MtBMtB Frets: 922
    @ourmaninthenorth I chose the Matamp C7 over the Univalve.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • I chose both so I win :-)
    Link to my trading feedback: http://thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/58787/
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • I had a C7 for a while, with their attenuator. And a C15-proto octal preamp combo thing too. Both better than the THD, but both ultimately sold as well. The C7 lacked top end and the C15 had waaaaaayyyy too much metallic kerrang. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • MtBMtB Frets: 922
    I sold my C7 after a couple of years, only to move on to a 1224Mk2 a further couple of years down the line. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • RockerRocker Frets: 4993
    The Harlequin was an amp that I tried out but did not like.  Crikey that was over 15 years ago!  Never ever saw a THD Univalve so cannot comment on it.
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. [Albert Einstein]

    Nil Satis Nisi Optimum

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • MtB said:
    I sold my C7 after a couple of years, only to move on to a 1224Mk2 a further couple of years down the line. 
    I too had a 1224, a mk1...dressed up to look like a Series 2000. I sold both the C7 and the 1224 to go down the Matchless route. In hindsight, I wish I'd have kept hold of the 1224...not to say there was anything wrong with what came after, far from it...just that I had a real soft spot for the Matamp, that became softer after it left. 


    http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/ee299/williams123_photo/DSCF0231.jpg

    http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/ee299/williams123_photo/DSCF0432-1.jpg
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • MtBMtB Frets: 922
    Likewise, I regret selling the 1224
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • ennspekennspek Frets: 1626
    A friend of mine who is a really good player loves his. Someone dropped it down two flights of a fire escape on eBay and no harm was do everything so they must be robust if nothing else.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.