It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
The judgment does NOT go as far as removing people from the bus, only from the space.
https://soundcertified.com/speaker-ohms-calculator/
*An Official Foo-Approved guitarist since Sept 2023.
Just old? or Old and infirm? Or young and infirm too?
Young and paid for their ticket -v- old and got a free bus pass?
Old and getting off 1 stop later -v- young and going long distance?
https://soundcertified.com/speaker-ohms-calculator/
No.
Never was.
I've got two daughters so yes I'm quite aware of how fragile babies are and how totally reliant on their parents or other care providers. I've had several experiences of attempting to balance my eldest daughter on my knee on a London bus.
I understand there's a fine balance between a buggy or a wheelchair bound person but I think the correct decision was made. In an ideal situation this conversation wouldn't need to happen as everyone can get on a bus an go to work, lunch, school or whatever without any hassle but life isn't always quite so idyllic
Twisted Imaginings - A Horror And Gore Themed Blog http://bit.ly/2DF1NYi
Some conventions for example:
Structure the document at all.
Summarise outcome and changes to status quo at the beginning of the document
Present supporting evidence in the detail usually in order of significance to the outcome rather than by history
Present contrary evidence separately (think pros and cons list).
Even if you consider the sole purpose of the judgement is for other trained professionals to reference I suspect their lives could be made easier by judges producing better structured documents.
It's not the best example I've ever seen.
It common for the judgment to deal with the arguments presented in the same order they were presented. So a judgment can be read pretty much along side a transcript of the hearing itself.
Hearings are naturally flexible. Everyone has a plan, and then the opponent or a Judge shifts to a different point, and then it gets back on track etc. The plan goes out the window.
When judgments get fully published in paper form they usually end up with a short summary of the dispute, and what was "Held" - in other words only the bits of the judgment that were a final decision on a point.
That doesn't usually get done for a while though. Until that happens often the best place is a good legal blog or journal, read with the judgment itself.
Appeals don't usually deal with evidence - they would deal with whether a decision by a more junior judge was correct based on the evidence given to that junior judge.
https://soundcertified.com/speaker-ohms-calculator/
Good use of judgement leads to a good judgment.
https://soundcertified.com/speaker-ohms-calculator/