It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
There's no way there were more people at Trump's inauguration than Obama's, but the press are baiting him (what was the point of the comparison) and got a predictable response - a little like this thread.
Personally Trump is great entertainment value - he says what he thinks rather than what a spin doctor has told him to say. I'm loving watching leftie liberals get in a lather on Facebook with their OTT virtue signalling ... I'd like to see what he does as I've had it with the smooth snake oil salesmen like Blair, Cameron and Clinton who are frankly cunts.
And go check out JFK's biography. Besides the usual booze, prostitutes and links to the mafia he nearly wiped out the world in an afternoon, but you wouldn't know it from the way he's revered.
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
Well the answer is obvious isn't it. There were more people at Trump's inauguration speech, it's just that they were thinner.
As far as Trump goes, he wasn't even in office yet before one of his tweets created 500 jobs in the US that otherwise would have been in Mexico by guilt shaming a large US car company.
Obama continued on with Bush's policies, OK there is the small matter of Congress, but all the same, Trump has already stepped into gear. Right or wrong, the opinion of the working majority of Americans is that they genuinely dislike Obama care. Of course it means your stuffed if your cancer comes back after remission on your private health care plan but hey.
You want someone nice and clean in charge of the world's largest superpower? Like Cameron or Corbyn for example? It wouldn't work. They role over quicker than Chamberlain
http://www.snopes.com/2017/01/20/obamas-inauguration-crowd-larger-than-trumps/
That Trump is now against the same media that he used to somehow get himself elected is the worrying part.
Twisted Imaginings - A Horror And Gore Themed Blog http://bit.ly/2DF1NYi
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
There is a very real danger in ignoring the 'small stuff'. Allowing him and his surrogates to blather minor untruths unchallenged is to abet his creation of a false reality - exactly as he did in his campaign - stating that America was some crime-ravaged destitute wasteland that only he could save when the facts simply didn't back up his claims. If he and his team keep repeating the same mantra, then as the election proved, eventually, people accept it as the truth. He needs that distorted perception of reality to exist in order to justify his bigger actions. That alone is why we must challenge every discoloured pixel he tries to place on the picture.
Offset "(Emp) - a little heavy on the hyperbole."
I don't really think you or I or most of us really know the facts because:
A: You aren't an American citizen and
B: You haven't worked in the USA all your life.
And besides if it goes tits up, all we have to do is programme our advanced multi billion pound nuclear weapon guidance systems on course for North Korea or the Atlantic and they'll head straight for the American mainland anyway.
Twisted Imaginings - A Horror And Gore Themed Blog http://bit.ly/2DF1NYi
So a disastrous presidency, really. But he had the good historical fortune to be assassinated, so the legend remains even through the truth is rather different. Ironically, Nixon was actually a much better President.
I genuinely hope no-one tries to kill Trump. I dislike him intensely as a person - due to his behaviour in Scotland, mostly - and I think he could prove quite dangerous on the world stage, but it would be even worse for him to be assassinated… and not just because Pence would become President.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
The evil, horrid Blair knew it. He didn't carp on constantly about the stinky Tories, he told us what *he* was going to do, turns out he was quite good at it and lots of people voted for him. Three times, in fact.
He knew what too many on the left seem to have forgotten lately: to compromise you first have to accept that the other lot hold their views in good faith, as that's what they believe is best. Then you tell them what's going to happen on your watch, and it sounds a whole lot more plausible.
Strong opposition and freedom of the press to be critical is absolutely vital regardless of who is in office - it leads to better government. The "mainstream media" might not be perfect but compared to off-the-wall loon balls like Breitbart and the Canary they're paragons of virtue.
Most of the US population hates him, so IMHO that's not going to work.
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
Obama, the first black president, took over from the chimp like proof of evolution Bush, who was hated by the end of it.
Trump, the rich pussy grabber, took over from Obama who even with his critics, was generally well liked on the global stage.
What gets me, is how many people want him killed or to fail. Last thing you want is your own leader to fail, or worse... get Pence in charge. It's your own fault as a country when your leadership vote was between a bigot and a warmonger
Also, has anyone asked all these feminists marches about Hillary's ties with countries where women can be killed for being raped?
And this was never dealt with properly ...
http://metro.co.uk/2016/01/08/former-staffer-accuses-bill-clinton-of-rape-and-hillary-of-silencing-her-5609171/
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!