It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
hang on a sec...
People extracting money from clients for SEO will debate these things until the cows come home, but at the end of the day if there are links and references to both www. and naked domain your SEO is affected a bit. A 301 should make that effect very small indeed, and a LOT smaller than most other things.
[quote] While it’s super awesome that Google is no longer “penalizing” 301 redirects through loss of PageRank, keep in mind that PageRank is only one signal out of hundreds that Google uses to rank pages.
Ideally, if you 301 redirect a page to an exact copy of that page, and the only thing that changes is the URL, then in theory you may expect no traffic loss with these new guidelines.
That said, the more moving parts you introduce, the more things start to get hairy. Don’t expect your redirects to non-relevant pages to carry much, if any, weight. Redirecting your popular Taylor Swift fan page to your affiliate marketing page selling protein powder is likely dead in the water. [/quote]
from https://moz.com/blog/301-redirection-rules-for-seo
:-bd
Remember, it's easier to criticise than create!
I have no idea what you lot are talkin' about but I'll nod sagely.
There's things I've had, there's things I wanna have"