I sent my mixes off to a mastering engineer to give his opinion on and one of the comments that came back is that there was quite a lot of mud around the 200hz area.
I've used high pass filters to clear out most of the frequencies below 100hz on the vocals and stringed instruments (there are some odd folk instruments), but I'm not really sure how to clean up the lower mid area.
Any suggestions here? Do I need to be a bit more aggressive with my high pass filters, particularly on the low-mid stringed instruments?
Or do you think this is best left to a mastering engineer to fix?
Comments
Generally you'd apply a single band narrow Q cut to the problem instruments. (rule of thumb is broad boost, narrow cut) Hearing the mud in the first place is totally dependent on your experience, monitors and room.
Leave it to the mastering engineer? No, if you can fix it you should. He's told you this specific issue because it's something that'll be much easier to fix at the individual track level than once it's all baked into a stereo .wav.
The thing about the 200hz region is that pretty much every single track will have stuff going on there. Bass guitar can get boomy there. Kick drums sound fat there. Snares punch or sound tubby there, depending on how high they're tuned - quite often on lower tuned snares a tubby, woofy first harmonic can be pulled back around that. Vocals have their body their, guitars have their fundamental frequencies and even some resonances from the cab, toms generally sound overblown with too much 200... basically, everything in the mix lives there.
One of my heroes, Daniel Lanois, says that the soul of the mix lives in those low mids. They're the hardest part to get right, since they're so busy, but if you just scoop them out like you're carving a pumpkin you loose a lot of the guts in the tone.
Bandcamp
Spotify, Apple et al
Would you say in general it would be safer to cut the less important areas of the mix - i.e. leave vocals and guitar type instruments and look mainly at percussion/keys/strings etc?
I would be very happy if I could get Daniel Lanois sound - amazing producer!
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AozLiXcK62nUsiUBWZTQl0mWEhdg
One other niggle is that some of percussion is too close micd and tiring on the ears. Sometimes a dynamic on bright stuff works better than a condensor
Everything else sounds good.
You could be right about the vocals needing a bit more presence as they can sometimes get a little lost in the mix.
Here are the comments from the mastering engineer which may provide a bit more clarity on what he was saying:
I had a listen. I like the tracks. The mix is not bad.
It is really down to what you want. To me the tracks sound muddy. They need some cleaning around 200Hz. That's the main thing that I noticed. Yes they could also benefit from a bit more presence (high-mids and highs), but I wouldn't touch that until you clean the low mids. After that everything else could just fall into place without the need of any eq boosting.
Now, the thing is that the mixes have a nice balance. The 200 area is quite tricky and delicate especially in acoustic music. If you cut too much or on the wrong instruments the mix will sound terribly thin.
If you like the balance of your mix and you don't feel confident cutting out low mids, leave that too me, I'll take care of it.
If you want to try it, make copies of what you've done, it is very easy to overdo it and end up with a mix that is actually far worse than the one you have one.
If you want you could try with one song and send it to me. Have a listen to the reference tracks, you'll see what I mean when I say "muddy". Again, the mixes are not bad at all, if you prefer to leave that to me in mastering is fine.
I soloed the 200hz frequency area with one of my surgical EQ plugins (Brainworx BX_Digital V3 in case you were curious) and there is a bit of a buildup there but it is not so bad that you would call it 'crowded' or 'muddy'.
I'm actually hearing more around 100-150hz than at 200hz.
Who is the mastering engineer?
Is he an experienced & reputable guy or one of the many guys with a computer and Waves plugins who call themselves mastering engineers (for some reason there doesn't seem to be much in between those two types)?
What sort of gear does he have, what sort of room?
If he is a pro and you like his aesthetic then I'd take his advice over anything you get here.
As to how do you clean up 200hz- I wouldn't use filters, but just some gentle EQ- cut 1-2db of that area of a few of the instruments using it and compare.
Decide on what you want to occupy that space and cut a bit out of everything else that isn't that.
200hz is a crucial snare frequency but given you don't have a snare in the track it should be fairly easy to do.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
He is a lot cheaper than the guys I usually use (Metropolis) but again that doesn't necessarily mean anything.
A 10 track album would be £350 from him, where Metropolois would be £1300 including VAT.
Are you prepared to take a change for one track and if you don't like it you've only lost £40?
I will say that I am somewhat skeptical of this whole iMastering thing.
Mastering is part art and part science- it isn't a foolproof formula of a thing- the main thing is having a rapport with someone.
I believe the best way to master an album is to do it in person- it is as much about the conversation you have with them about song order, things you might have done differently etc as it is the final product.
And it is nice to hear the album in a decent room, or at least a different room to where you tracked/mixed it.
Plus they have cool toys.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com