It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Martin have had a few goes lately at doing new and interesting stuff. Now we just need Martin buyers to get their heads out of the past.
PS: European Spruce, maple, and walnut. Beautiful, sustainable, great sound unless I miss my guess.
without seeing them in the flesh the bracing looks pretty chunky before they play with their new laser toy. Also why identical patterns on each brace. I also love its laser cut except the bit she has to remove with a chisel.
any way sure some people will like it. It is the Namm season
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Almost seems directly targeted at converting Taylor players.
But - the purpose of top bracing on an acoustic is to enable thinner tops. Known beneficial bracing characteristics are strength, clever positioning, construction in the right wood (more often than not Sitka Spruce) and lightness. Are these new 'R101' braces (it was an airship) lighter inch per inch than scalloped bracing? Are they stronger?
Also, if it's Martin, will it be cheap?
Only decider is to try it I suppose.
I wouldn't go so far as to say they are after Taylor players though. It is reasonable to see it as a more of a broadly-targeted product aimed at anyone who isn't hopelessly wedded to the "traditional way is the best and only way" mantra. That would naturally include Taylor players, but also players of any flavour. In particular, I imagine that they are looking for younger players. If so that is a very sensible thing to do - tradition has been a fantastic marketing tool for Martin for many years, but there is no guarantee that it will go on working forever. Smart management always a Plan B.
Or maybe they simply think this might be a way to build a better guitar.
(PS: most buyers either want a pickup as standard, or else don't much care either way. This is why so many guitar makers include a pickup as standard on most models: it costs very little more by the time you factor in economies of scale and supply chain simplification, broadens the appeal of the guitar, and if done properly has zero impact on its acoustic sound. Bit of a no-brainer really.)
Additionally, if they use lasers to cut wood so well, how come the Ad shows such an untidily cut X-Brace (I can do a lot better than that with a bit of care and a handsaw, as @TTony can confirm).
To me, this style of bracing reminds me a bit of Viennese style bracing. Did not the famed Founder of Martin Guitars work and study under probably the most famous (and innovative) Viennese maker of guitars, and other instruments, Johann Stauffer?
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Red Spruce does indeed have a higher strength to weight ratio than Sitka, but the difference is marginal. And if it comes to that, Western Red Cedar, gram for gram, is comfortably stronger than either.But is the strength-to-weight ratio particularly important for bracing? Atkin clearly don't think so - all Atkin guitars are braced with what they coyly call "redwood", which is in fact Baltic Pine (also known as "Scots Pine"), a timber not as strong as Sitka Spruce but 30% heavier! (And while I've never played one myself, I only hear good things about Atkin.)
But let's assume the weight of bracing does matter. What then is the point of Martin's R-101 style braces, which sacrifice a bit of strength and save not very much weight, when far more advanced construction methods are readily available?
Here, for example, is the bracing of my Mineur baritone. It is much stronger than any plain wooden bracing can be, much lighter, and above all can easily be curved for (according to the designer) superior structural and acoustic properties. These particular braces are made from King Billy Pine and carbon fibre, but any light, easy-to-bend timber would do.
Actually, i think you'll find the bracing of the R100 was significantly lighter and stronger. But then we don't have pictures of that one after a crash because (as know if I am any guess) it was well-made and airworthy and didn't crash.
Of course not.
Acoustic body design is always a careful balance of weight and stiffness - this makes perfect sense
Instagram
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Typical applications for these very high strength, low weight combinations are racing cars, light aircraft (especially gliders, where strength and weight are everything), and racing yachts. But there is no reason musical instrument makers cannot learn from other crafts. (Again, see above. Falcate bracing - as on the baritone soundboard pictured and also on my older concert-size guitar - is nowadays a well-established textbook technique for luthiers. Lots of different makers use it,. We have yet to see the mass production factories start using it, but that is bound to happen before too long.
Martin Certified Wood Series | GPCE Inception Maple - Peach Guitars
It does make me wonder, this is marketed as sustainable but in reality the kind of people who will buy this will have a load of other acoustics already and really just want the latest thing. Guitars are only sustainable if they are your only/main instrument rather than one of many.