It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I'd be interested in this. Have had my Helix since March and run it through a Yamaha DXR10. I've only been brave enough to do one gig direct to PA so far (previously just using it as an FX board into my amp), but it was a really positive first run out. The soundman loved it and being able to mix myself on stage to my taste was a real bonus. Still a long way to go before I don't have a cold sweat about leaving the amp at home, but all the early signs are looking good!
Would be great to pick the brains of others who've been gigging a similar set-up for longer than me, so will keep an eye out for progress re venue/dates etc.
I love going straight to PA - less hassle, less kit, easier to control the mix etc.
My music:- https://soundcloud.com/hubobulous
If you set a date and a location (as was done with the Quad session, for example), people know what, where and when they're aiming at.
Would *I* be interested in attending? Well, I might, but it would depend on where and when. Rather than just replying with "it depends", I'd wait until decisions were made, and then say yea / nay.
If you can assemble a core of 5-6 people, covering a range of the modelling units, and get them committed to a date/location, then the meet-up can go ahead whether others turn up or not. But, having got that commitment, my bet is that others *will* turn up.
Quad had the advantage of being very flexible in terms of space too. If lots of people turn up (as they did for the jam session), the guys there are very flexible in allowing us to overflow into additional rooms.
It might be that - as it's reasonably central - Quad becomes a default venue for this sort of thing, and we might even be able to arrange regular events there.
View my feedback at www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/1201922