So the CIO (head of IT) asked me last week to come up with some personae for typical workers in the organisation for a project that I am working on. Nothing major, "just spend a few hours on it, and send it over". So I did. I put together about six different personae/roles, stuck them in a PowerPoint presentation, and sent them across.
The CIO writes back saying "Great, those are a fantastic start", etc. and copies in about six people including my boss (who is between the two of us on the org structure) saying that we need to build on these for this project and others. So my immediate boss then writes to me saying "Quarky, I would have appreciated a discussion and review prior to sending..."?
WTF?
Am I in the wrong here? Should I have to copy my direct boss in on every email to my boss's boss? Is there some rule here that I need to ask for clarification on? I mean, this isn't the first time and I think she is just being incredibly controlling and paranoid, but am I missing something?
We (my immediate boss and I) typically have a meeting once a week to "catch up", where (to me) this might have been mentioned, but she hasn't bothered to attend the last three so there was no meeting to even mention it at..
Comments
Having said that I’m very weary of passing judgement on these types of threads, as you never really get the full picture.
I wouldn't worry about it, but it might be worth a chat with the direct manager to confirm expectations for the future rather than letting it become "a thing"
But then I never do - my boss catches up with me every six weeks or so, and otherwise leaves me to it. Doesn't give a crap who I do or don't speak to as long as things get done around the place.
This sort of bullshit the OP is suffering is reminiscent of another boss I had once who controlled me to the point where I never met her boss. Just wouldn't have happened. She wanted to filter out every bit of credit she possibly could from every damn thing I did, like a whale hoovering up plankton. If she'd insisted I do something her way to the letter and it went tits-up (as it did from time to time) she wanted to make damn sure that wasn't on her either.
Office politics bollocks. Don't let it get to you. If your gaffer says she wants in, let her in on it. Just jump around a bit when she says jump and crack on with your job.
Some people treat work like they're at war, I suspect because they have very little going on in their personal lives. Just let it wash over you, collect the salary, go home and play your guitar. At least that's what I did with the aforementioned horror boss.
Yep, great point, which is why I really appreciate all comments, especially those that go against my instinct (like @Teetonetal
above).
There is history, and she has been annoyed with me before over something like this, but it just seems like such a normal way to work to me. If someone asks me to do something, and I can do it, I will. Especially when that person is the head of IT and it is directly related to a project I am working on. She has been my boss for about a year, and I think she fostered a fortress mentality in the team, and it is so strong that it verges on groupthink. It is a lot different to how I used to work.
If I am in the wrong here, I guess I need to know what the rules are. Next time the CIO asks, do I ask him to go through my boss instead, even though that was never the way we worked in the past? Do I just ask her to sort it out with him (or the reverse)? Do I just copy every single email I send to the CIO to her?
It is kind of difficult to ask what her expectations are without coming across as an arsehole, but I think you are right, that is probably what is required.
Chips are "Plant-based" no matter how you cook them
Donald Trump needs kicking out of a helicopter
I'm personally responsible for all global warming
But then I don't know your boss, so caveat emptor! Don't give it the Bruce Willis in Die Hard on my account for god's sake
Quite a bit more delicately, in fact.
I'd also probably miss out the bit where you imply she's shit because her boss skipped her out.
I'm lucky to be in a (generally) very good team. Most other teams where I am are far more divisive and/or backstabby
The trick with work is to care enough to do any tasks your are asked to do, as well as you can.
Then don't care about the consequences or what people think too much. Caring about what people think - boss, bosses boss, MD, cleaner, office junior - whoever, is pointless. Ignore the criticism, equally ignore praise, do what you do as you see fit. All I'd say in this instance is 'I'll copy you in next time.'
So care a lot, then don't give a fuck. People learn to know you are somebody who can get the job done, but not somebody that can be ruffled.
Precisely this.
Good reasons for the manager two levels above to request your input and effort include you being considered the staff member best suited to the task.
Bad reasons include the manager two levels above suspecting that you do not have enough other work to be getting on with. If your immediate manager is any good at her job, one of her functions is to guard against extra tasks being dumped on her team.
The most likely explanation is that the manager two levels above needed the task doing and could not find your immediate manager for her to delegate.
By any chance, did this happen on a Friday?
Great words there. I hate it when people have no personal life and work is their life, (unless they have a cool career like a band).
Is your direct boss directly related to the project (other than being your boss)?
To me, i wouldn't see you as having done anything wrong.
I work quite autonomously in my job - i'm the only person who can do the stuff i do, and so i regularly get asked stuff by my bosses boss, as well as other managers and such around the business. Majority of the time i don't go through my boss for anything really.. we work well together