It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Seriously: If you value it, take/fetch it yourself
And you hear this plugged in too, the 64 is much closer to my 53/9 Les Paul conversion, you can see how this model was the successor to the Les Paul - there's a common lineage.
The 69 is just more of everything, and in that does lose some of the subtlety, the 69 is instant Angus, Iommi etc - just in your face, the 64 more blues rock - which again fits with the whole Clapton vibe
The different pickups clearly make a difference - the 69 having T-tops which were/are much more mid-focussed, but also the acoustic tone variance I put down not only to the bat wing, but also a very, very different neck joint and profile (64 wide and flat, 69 narrower and thicker)
Very interesting. I'd concur with your neck and pickup theory. There was a good thread with photo's on the LPF about SG neck/body joints and heel shape in different years in the 60's. Gibson seemed to keep changing the design.