Advice on a PRS

1979

No problem @John_A hope you get sorted 

CarpeDiem

As

guitars4you said:

John_A said:

More daft questions - The SC250 seems to go for a lump less than the 245, is there any difference apart from scale length?

slightly hotter p/ups on a SC250 - adjustable wrap over on the SC250 - Sure that I recall SC250 are locking tuners

As far as I'm aware the SC250 is not weight relieved. It's also the basis for the Tremonti model.

meltedbuzzbox

impmann said:

John,

That will sound very different to your old (now my) CE22. The CE has a more Fender-y attack, plus that thick lump of maple will react very differently to the body on the CE.

I've yet to play a 'bad' PRS neck but that CE really does have a special one.

And no, sorry... its not for sale, as its now my go-to guitar. :-)

Dentist wanker :-P

guitars4you

CarpeDiem said:

As

guitars4you said:

John_A said:

More daft questions - The SC250 seems to go for a lump less than the 245, is there any difference apart from scale length?

slightly hotter p/ups on a SC250 - adjustable wrap over on the SC250 - Sure that I recall SC250 are locking tuners

As far as I'm aware the SC250 is not weight relieved. It's also the basis for the Tremonti model.

I'm not going to say all SC250's are chambered, as PRS had a habit of changing such features without ever telling you - Don't recall them ever announcing that the original S/Cut would now be chambered  - Ditto SC245's and S250's as it was never announced as such that they were chambered - You just find out  - But SC250's are chambered

Granted the SC250 is closer to the Tremonti than a 245 - but still with slight differences and of course 2 different Tremonti's with fixed bridge or trem - Tremonti's not chambered

250 1st then 245 further below