I had a conversation recently with a chap from work, we were out driving and listening to the radio and he seemed to know all the words to a lot of songs which was impressive, as we were chatting it became apparent that we listened to music quite differently. I explained that I seek out the underlying instruments, especially guitar first, noting the drumming patterns, effects used, bass lines, keyboard parts, noting any key changes and after a few listens put it all together with the vocals. He said he just listens to the singer and doesn't really care what's going on with the instruments.
Do musicians hear music differently to non musicians, is it a good thing or a curse?
Comments
soundcloud.com/thecolourbox-1
youtube.com/@TheColourboxMusic
I can think of one self-proclaimed non-musician who pays a great deal of attention to music. Brian Eno.
I finf that as eell, I listen out for different things.
All music on popular radio is shit.
Planet rock is mostly good although sometimes I can't understand how some bands even got a record deal let alone air time.
Especially when I got into bass, I started hearing basslines on the radio so clearly whereas before I wouldn't have noticed.
Of course it depends on the radio itself, some devices (including mobile phones' built in speaker) don't even reproduce the bass which can be annoying for a bassist!
Thankfully I've remained fairly ignorant.
There are certainly songs I hear differently now because I've learned them for bands but I don't think you have to have studied music at any length to recognise a guitar solo or what a middle eight is or hear a key change. It sometimes amazes me how opinionated people can be about musician's technical skills without actually having a Scooby.
Transcribe a few tunes completely and then you'll start listening totally differently. If you don't read/write then try isolating them and noticing everything that goes on....or playing along as much as you can. You listening skills will quickly change
Of course musicians listen to music differently - just as film-makers watch movies and tv differently, authors read books differently, etc, etc.
A lot of creation comes from the act of deconstruction and, definitely, from understanding.
I have gone from being ambivalent about a song to absolutely loving it once I've learned it though. So I think it can work the other way.
In some pop the vocal takes up nearly the whole sound with instrumentation just filling in around it.
I heard a nickelback song on the radio in the doctors the other day and noticed how much dominance the vocal was given compared to the rock music they're coloured after.
On some indie rock the vocal isn't even necessarily louder than other instruments, sometimes just blended in equally. I personally like this approach as long as they're mixed in a way they're always audible.
I listen and wait for it to either effect me or pass me by.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
My best mate is very in to lyrics - when he listens to a song for the first time he's fully paying attention to the lyrics (as one would pay attention to the content of a lecture for example) and knows after one listen what the lyrics are about.
When I listen to a song for the first time I'm barely paying any attention to the lyrics. Maybe after a few listens a couple of lines might pop out and grab my attention. It's only really when I've listened to a song a lot that I know what all the lyrics are about (and I do get great pleasure from great lyrics).
It affects the music we like too - he likes a lot of rap where lyrics are such a key part and isn't that into music where the lyrics are second place to the melody they're singing.
He's really the only person I've talked to about this at length so it's possible that either one of us is a weirdo and everyone else is like the other lol