Hey,
So I'll try to keep this post short, but I'm just wanting some advice from more the more experienced buyers...
So I'm 16 in 2 weeks, I currently have an Ibanez RG370AHMZ and a custom hart guitars explorer. I'm gonna put a new SC in my Ibanez and rewire it to make it even more versatile. I also have quite a few other guitars along with my dad's, but these are
my two main guitars. I'm into metal primarily, but also blues, rock, jazz... whatever really
I'm now thinking that I could open a new savings account and pay a bit in each month and gradually build up to being able to afford a Gibson Les Paul... In 20 years obviously lol. I see a few on the classifieds now and again, 80s models for £2k ish and I know it would obviously depend on the individual guitar but I feel like I'm covered for gear at the minute and wondering wether saving up for a guitar I've always wanted is better than buying several more midrange guitars...
Also, what would you look at? A new or old LP? I'd like one with a finish that will wear (nitro??) or has worn by being played, just something that will develop character and has/ will develop its life with me if that makes sense. It would have to be a heavy (in weight) guitar for mainly heavy (sonically) rock/ metal/ blues...
There is just so much out there, so many snobs and people voicing their opinions as fact and it's hard to know where to start looking other than to see one and say you like it or not...
I really appreciate any help,
Cheers!
Comments
There are lots of good guitars out there though, and at your tender age, you've probably not tried all of them yet.
So, whilst saving, get out there and play as many different guitars as you can. That might be in shops, or trying out your mates guitars, or whatever, wherever.
The only opinion that's really fact is your own
You're already covered for gear so what would several more midrange guitars give you? Some novelty value at first then nothing?
Is your desire for a Les Paul from experience of playing one? I ask that because they feel very different to something like an RG.
Yes, one great guitar is better than several average (or even good) ones. A Les Paul Custom is actually a very versatile guitar, you can play anything from jazz to metal and anything in between on one.
At the price they are new I wouldn't even consider anything other than second hand.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
https://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/157081/fs-gibson-les-paul-traditional-2014-120th-anniversary#latest
Thanks man!
Trading feedback
You’re RG may already cover the tonal bases well enough for what you play (and it’s probably easier to play than many LPs).
Cheers!
Trading feedback
a Les Paul doesn't have to be heavy to rock.
Trading feedback
No I don't agree with Gibson's current stance re 'play authentic' and all that bollocks, but get yourself a nice older one and you'll have a guitar for life (I personally wouldn't touch a new one with a barge pole).
Formerly TheGuitarWeasel ... Oil City Pickups ... Oil City Blog 7 String.org profile and message
Trading feedback
Love my goldtops, the finish will be the most difficult choice for me
Trading feedback
Trading feedback
Trading feedback
Trading feedback
Trading feedback