It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Picked up a white 50s CV a few months ago, updated the wiring and stuck the pickups from the Paisley in and it’s a brilliant guitar.
The neck doesn’t feel particularly slim, not a whole lot different profile to the other two really and I’m normally quite picky about neck shapes.
edit: just had them back to back and while the CV is slimmer, it is of a similar profile, eg decent shape around the shoulders, rather than a v shape.
Quite happy to gig it alongside anything else I own.
Regardless of how good anyone thinks the guitar is or isn't, or how cheap it is, it's quite possibly the most hyped guitar the internet has ever known.
Obviously plenty of people prefer fat necks too - and aside from personal comfort preference, a fat neck gives such an impression of quality.
But I'd probably guess that having a slim neck is one of the reasons a lot of people like the CV Tele.
Some might read the hype, buy one and find it's as good as they'd ever need a Tele to be so feel the hype was right - it is a special guitar. That's assuming, though, that other Teles in that price range wouldn't be as good but I think in reality they would be.
So I think really it's the idea that a good Tele doesn't have to cost a lot that is the message rather than Fender happened to have priced one of their best guitars too low and have created some kind of loophole that can be exploited.
Imagine someone asked if there were any Gibson Les Pauls that were as good as an Epiphone.