It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
This would certainly resolve that time problem leaving more time for actually playing.
The guitar version is excellent for that, and if I was in the market to upgrade / replace my usual recording guitar then I'd definitely look at something with the Evertune bridge on it just to save that time.
I saw a great vid about setting it up differently for rhythm and lead parts. When set for rhythm bent notes did not change the pitch at all. It negated the effect of inadvertent bends or pressing too hard on the board. None of that caused the pitch to go sharp.
Then set it differently to allow for bending for solos and vibrato etc, but still maintaining rock solid tuning even with string slippage from bending.
Very clever indeed.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
That's not the exact problem it's trying to solve. It's one of them, but the main one it solves is the decoupling of how hard you play and how sharp the note goes.
It's definitely possible to send a bass note sharp if you need to play it hard, and not always desirable. It's even more noticeable on a typical 34" 5 string low B.
This doesn't mean the string doesn't return to the original pitch afterwards, but would mean if your goal was to layer in a hard played sustained note with another instrument that had a flat[er] pitch arc (e.g. synth, piano) then the note would start sharp and decay flatter.
You can test this by plugging in to a tuner and playing softly, then playing hard, and watching the difference in how sharp the initial attack goes. With evertune that difference is reduced to where it basically can't be heard in use, it'll show as a few cents on the tuner on lower strings (so I'm interested to see how it works on bass) but in practical terms you could play a series of takes and they'd all sound in tune with each other, and in my experience, other instruments tuned to the same reference pitch with flatter pitch arcs.
Without evertune, if you wanted that same result for a recording, you'd have to do a lot of punch ins re-tuned for how each part is played. And even change technique to play certain notes more softly to avoid too much pitch arc. It can also correct for finger pressure on the fretboard, of which there's currently no other mechanical solution. Or, and what is currently common on bass as it's easier to get a good result with monophonic tuning, you'd tune it using something like Melodyne.
I disagree it's good practice to retune after every take, but it takes experience to know when to and when not to re-tune, and also depends on the limitation of the instrument itself and the way it's being used.
It's notoriously difficult to record a guitar perfectly in tune - in fact even evertune isn't perfectly in tune, just significantly closer to. But that's also part of the sound of guitar.
If you record a good take that's in tune enough for the style of music, and the tuning of the guitar hasn't shifted from start to end of take, then the best match for tuning is going to be doing the next take straight away. If you're not doing lots of bending and the temperature in the room is pretty consistent you can often record multiple takes without re-tuning, especially if the player is decent and the style doesn't need lots of punch ins.
With regards to setting evertune up for rhythm or lead, I find that's often not needed if the player is decent. If you set it up on the edge of where it transitions for bending it'll work for both rhythm and string bending, you'll just feel a tiny bit more pressure as you start to bend. If your fretting hand is decent then it's very hard to knock it out of 'evertuning' even with heavy picking, but you'll still be able to bend. For my own playing I've never found it necessary to turn bending off completely.
Bandcamp
Spotify, Apple et al
That said I stand by every word :P
I genuinely understand the pitch variance/envelope thing, I just don’t believe it’s a real issue suffered by anyone doing anything musically interesting.
You can do in a single take with an Evertune what could require multiple punch ins on a regular guitar. And those punch ins do get done on musically interesting albums, if they’re done well you’ll never know as a listener but it does often take considerable time and effort. It’s rare to hear out of tune guitars these days though aesthetics do vary.
I don’t know what you listen to but if it’s anything in the last 10 years you may have listened to Evertune guitars without knowing.
Enjoy Italy
Bandcamp
Spotify, Apple et al
*that was recorded without evertune…
One thing I enjoy with Evertune is I can keep the original timing without worrying about how I’m going to piece together punch ins / section by section recording.
I don’t use it every time, in fact most recently all the tracking I’ve done has been on regular bridges because I wanted that sound.
But when I do use evertune the recording process is enjoyable, and I find that comes across in the end result.
I’ve often used both normal and Evertune bridges in the same song. Nobody has ever asked me which bridges I’ve used when.
The only thing stopping me is its pretty pricy to get a retrofit so at some point will prob try to pick up an existing guitar with one already fitted as it seems like a more cost effective version.
Of course that's just for the musically uninteresting bits.
The bass version being top routed is very interesting. I wonder if they’ve managed to significantly shorten the spring design vs the current guitar version