Hello guys
I'm close to purchasing one of these Martin SC-13e's - Would you recommend one? I do like the access to the higher frets but it's not essential. I've watched plenty of youtube demos, they sound great but is there anything negative I should know?
I was also looking at second hand Gibsons, SJ-200's to be exact. Haven't explored the other realms of possibilities yet. I like the natural fishman pickup output on the demos, without that overly piezo sound. I delve between finger picking and strumming also, so not strictly one style.
Cheers,
Phil.
Comments
The only negative that I've read is that the special shimming system for the bolt-on neck is not a thing that your local luthier can do. It needs a Martin dealer, and (supposedly) one that has been trained in the specific details.
I'm open to other acoustic suggestions to be fair, up the the 2k range but this Martin did catch my eye.
Modmins, could you please move this to the acoustic section? Thank you
It also looks much less odd when you see it in the room held in the playing position, than it does vertical against a plain background in most of the catalogue/dealer pics.
(You can move the thread to the acoustic section yourself if you click on the little wheel symbol at the top right and select edit.)
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
I plan to do a lot of recording with it but I think it may be a balance between mic'd up and plugged in to see which sounds better to suit what I'm outputting
It does possess that natural Martin sound too. I'm not really too bothered about dread loudness but I can imagine you are correct with it being quite short of the output of one of those!
And here is the key point. They are way over priced. £1500-£1700 for a plywood guitar? On what planet is that reasonable?
Browsing Guitar Guitar just now, for the same money or less you can buy a Furch Blue (various models), Furch Green (several models), Taylor 314ce, Martin 000-15M or 00-15M or D-15M, Maton SRS-60C or Performer, Cole Clark FL1, FL 2, Angel 1, and Angel 2. Also, a used Avalon A12, used Maestro Traditional OM, ex-demo Taylor American Dream, used Lakewood, two different used Larrivvees.
All of those just mentioned are high-quality instruments in all solid wood (which the Martin is not), made in First World high-wage countries (which the Martin is not).
You can do better for the same money. Much better.
I'm a huge fan of Queensland Maple back and sides. QM doesn't have the lovely and obvious in-your-face distinctive trademark tone of something like rosewood or Blackwood; instead it simply provides a well-rounded, all-purpose sound which you can do as you like with. It is, in a word, biddable. It doesn't say "I sound like this, do you like me?" it says "what sort of sound do you want today?"
BTW, in my previous comment I neglected to say that I applaud Martin's work with the SC-13. It is really good to see them thinking outside the box and actually doing something they were not doing in 1935. Time moves on, technology advances, and good on Martin for recognising that.
But I wouldn't buy one, they are way too dear.
The model in question is built at their Mexico factory.....
I have to say I'd want all solid if I was spending £1,700.
is way too much for laminate back and sides.
you look at the used market.
If it sounds better from across the room than a D-18, which is overpriced?
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
And unless I seriously miss my guess, those all-solid, no-corners-cut guitars from the likes of Furch, Maton, and Taylor will eat it alive.
(I haven't played one, but I've played other "cheap" Martins and come away very unimpressed.)
PS: Of the American majors, the only one which has the knack of making "cheap" guitars (actually still expensive for what they are, but cheaper than the mainstream models) is Taylor.
But ISTR that the same body style is now available in a high-end US-built all-solid version, too. If so, perhaps it will start to filter up and down the range?
(And I see that the one in Classifieds has sold.)
Aren’t they a lot more expensive? The point is that I don’t think it’s overpriced at what it is, which is not a high-end price these days, even though I’ve also heard better guitars which cost a lot more.
Are we sure it’s to cut costs, or is it possible it’s actually a deliberate design choice with this style of body?
I don’t know, but I do know that guitar sounds great, and I wouldn’t even have guessed it was laminate.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
"We’ve started using fine veneer woods for the Road Series, and that does make them roadworthy, because you don’t have to worry about the wood cracking and moving around as much.
We’re also able to offer better aesthetics - such as more figuring and flame in the grain with fine veneer woods, such as the koa in this instance - at a much lower price point than we could with solid back and sides."
But I'll definitely try one as soon as I can. It's the sound that matters.
1700 does seem steep but used prices still seem a bit soft for these so they’re probably a great used buy.
When they came out in 2019 I really admired Martin for expanding the envelope of guitar design even further. It's commercially very brave to go out on a limb with such a radical design and good luck to them because they seem to have sold a lot. Unlike violins, when you're making a guitar you can change many parameters and still end up with something called a guitar! Martin were very adventurous with the SC13E and that's good.
And yes Martin's generally are very expensiveville, but £1.7K no longer seems that expensive for an instrument from a top maker. It's certainly not expensive for a Martin.
I don't go a bundle on that solid/laminate top contoversy either. If a guitar suits your tonal requirements who cares.
Apart from @ICBM whose mate has got one, we haven't heard from anyone on this thread who owns one as yet. It would be great to get some owner feedback.