I am going to be doing some recording over Christmas and would like to pick up an acoustic in Black Friday to help with that. After that, I'll also use it for inspiration at home, and potentially some playing live (where it will mostly be used for specific tracks, with the majority of the gig on electric).
I was hoping to crowdsource some recommendations from the collective Fretboard brain. My requirements are:
- Budget up to around £750ish, ideally. If I need to budget more and save up for something perfect, let me know!
- Can be new or used, new is preferable
- Needs to have the capability built in for recording/connecting to PA (whatever system, piezo, onbaord mic etc) - it just needs to sound good this way
- Ideally it won't be too loud acoustically - I know that's counter towards what a lot of people want but I play in a family home, often at night. This guitar will almost always live through a mixer; I want it to sound good unplugged but I don't need it to boom through the whole house.
I'm not really thinking about a specific EQ profile or tonewoods, as I am pretty easy on that. It just needs to play and sound good - I'm hopeful that, as there are some incredible lower-price electrics these days, the same is true of acoustics.
Things I have seen so far:
- Sire Larry Carlton A4
- Sigma s000m-15e
- Yahama LL16 ARE
Thanks in advance!
Comments
you are about to run the risk of everyone telling you that all acoustic pick up systems in the world bar the one in their guitar is crap. But if you are playing live the audience don’t realise or care, and if you are recording you can use EQ/reverb anyway
LL, LS or LJ depending on your preference.
I’ve owned an LL16 and a LS6. Both were great.
And thank you @nero1701 and @sev112 ;
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
The LL is significantly bigger than a standard dead. It can be a loud guitar (if you play it loudly). It is rather bright sounding (which is brought under control with PB strings), but has all the rosewood characteristics. A nice scoop and loads of splashy overtones and that piano-like attack. It has tonnes of headroom, much more than my Martin D-16GT. It is quite (reassuringly?) heavily built and has a fair old chunk of a neck on it. I love almost everything about mine, but my preference is for slimmer necks. This may or may not be an issue for you, depending on your preferences. I also find buying from Yamaha to be more reassuring in an ethical sense due to them owning the factories where the guitars are built and having a responsible wood sourcing policy and supply chain.
I would also look at the LL/LS TA. I played the LL TA in Kenny's in Glasgow and was mightily impressed with the sound. I can imagine them being rather handy for recording.
get a feedback buster to cover the sound hole.
Note that it isn't me saying these things about China and illegal logging and it isn't some radical eco-nut group, this is Interpol. (I have linked the relevant Interpol statements on this site before.) (Somewhere.)
My impression - and it is just an impression, I have no evidence to support it - is that Eastman make nice instruments and would do the right thing if they could. Personally, I'd love an Eastman acoustic archtop - hardly anyone else makes them these days, not real acoustic ones - but I couldn't cope with waking up at nights and wondering how many Orangutans died for my new guitar.
I don't insist on best-in-class sustainability credentials when I buy a guitar (Cole Clark & Taylor are the world leaders, and all kudos to them) but I do insist on at least crossing out the worst-in-class. So I won't buy anything made in China*, or in Indonesia (which is also seriously bad).
* Yamaha do most of their manufacturing in China but (at least as I understand it) work hard to do it in an ethical way, and are well on the way to properly documenting their sources. So I cut them some slack. Indeed, last year I bought a Yamaha student guitar on that basis.