It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
Does now come with a download pack though.
I've heard and played with the Helix and, yes, it's even more flexible than what I've built. It is at least half the cost of my setup, definitely lighter and less cumbersome, but what it doesn't have is anything of ME invested in it. As I said, I suspect I'll end up with one or something similar in the future, but for the moment it's just a curiosity because I'm pretty happy with what I have already built.
- 3 Sigma
- CabIR.EU
- Celestion Plus
- Dr Bonkers (bass only)
- Fractal & ML Soundlabs (Fractal only)
- Karzog
- Ownhammer
- Redwirez
- Rosen Digital
- Two Notes
My opinion is Ownhammer is what I'd recommend first. They're good value, very well recorded, and I find them easy to use.
As pointed out by @Sporky the level may be higher on OH IRs so if you're comparing you should level match to make it fair.
I know most users in this thread are not IR users, but having spent a lot of hours with real Mesa cabs (2x12 and 4x12 with Mesa V30s) and multiple packs from different companies my own subjective opinion is that the Ownhammer ones are overall the best mix of well recorded, well organised, and value for money.
Likewise with Greenbacks - I've got several packs with greenbacks (M magnet Greenbacks being my other favourite speaker) and the Ownhammer Marshall greenback cabs are very well done.
Now (finally) with the knowledge the Helix IR block was separate to the inbuilt cabs I understand why some Helix users prefer the workflow of inbuilt.
Interestingly from chatting to Drew (who is still loving his Helix) he also said he preferred this setup because he can skip the inbuilt cabs altogether and use OH more easily, scrolling with his feet.
I do wonder how much of this is down to sounds used. In my own experience, the higher the gain the more important small movements in mic placement tend to be (especially balancing clarity vs fizzy high end, or solid low end vs mud).
am I unhappy with this sound ... no
ok ill load up some IRS and see if they improve it drastically
load up and and audition
not enough difference to make me go through the hassle
I simply don't think that's true, and I think that's predicated on sloppy testing.
That said, I've never been a cork sniffer. I want to get on with building sounds and playing with them. The stock cabs are perfectly good, but I accept that some people derive pleasure from spending time and money on rabbit-holes.
If your setup was stolen would you replace it with a Helix?
It took me ages to save up and build my rig too but I bought my digital unit from somewhere that did 30 day returns and in the end I sold pretty much everything except my very basic Boss/Dunlop board 'just in case'. A couple of years on and several of those pedals are on loan anyway.
What I meant was that from how you've described your approach to your current pedalboard, you'd put a lot of you into making your Helix patches.
I liked building my pedalboard, but I really like constructing sounds in the Helix. You get all the creative side but none of the practical hassles - and, as you've mentioned, vastly more flexibility and possibilities.
Everybody has their own level of 'that'll do'.
I don't think it's a rabbit hole unless you're chasing a unicorn.
If you've already got the unicorn there's nothing to chase.
I also think it is a fair observation (expanding on this) that some people don't know what their unicorn sounds like... that's where the time will go. This is a common 'issue' many have had with any versatile equipment - including multi channel amps...
I did all my 'cork sniffing'/'rabbit chasing' with speaker cabs and mics, just like I'm sure most people did theirs with real amps/drive pedals before getting a Helix... To me it's not difficult to tell if I've got the right one or not, or what I should look for, because I've already done the homework to an extent... same reason as I usually recommend people (if they want to) start with buying an IR pack that is the same as the cab they'd usually use. I know that proved useful for at least one member here. I don't advocate reinventing the wheel when there's no need
IRs/stock cabs whatever you want to use.... they are a million times faster (and cheaper - at one point I owned 5 real cabs, so my IR collection is a tiny % of that) than using real mics and cabs. It takes seconds to tell if you've got the right one, just like it takes seconds to tell if you've got your mic in the right position or not with a real cab. But you can just hit next, instead of putting your headphones back on/unplugging/rearranging everything/losing the will to live when you accidentally knock a mic stand over.
Not having to deal with velcro and finding the right length patch cable is a pretty big plus.
I'm not knocking 3rd party IRs, I am just wary/weary of the mantra that the built in stuff is awful and you have to buy 3rd party IRs in order not to make your audience vomit in disgust.
Just to clarify that this is not that argument, I was replying to Timmy's post asking about what 3rd party IRs people had bought.