It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
It was nice not being the one to say it for once
@digitalscream has made a good number of points... I don't need to repeat those. Further to his points, if dogs were always vying for 'pack position', there would be more fights and more problems. Usually the dogs that have the issues are the ones without confidence. It's easy to bully those dogs because they are already terrified.
Millan uses shock collars and prong collars - they have no place in ANY dog training under ANY circumstances. If you're willing to bully a dog into submission, you have no business "training" a dog.
As @digitalscream says - dominance theory is outdated and wrong. It was based on a study of an artificial wolf pack in the 1940's. The problems are twofold (1) Dogs aren't wolves and (2) wolf packs are stable - they are not created artificially.
Throwing a load of unfamiliar wolves together and drawing conclusions from their behaviour is like saying Big Brother is a serious anthropological study.
So, as dogs aren't wolves, why do we believe those who use a flawed study into wolves when it comes to dog behaviour? It's nonsense.
A Chihuahua and a St. Bernard are more closely related to each other than a wolf and a dog - but we don't threat those breeds the same. A German Shepherd and a Spaniel are very different and think of the world in a different way - so you train them both differently... but there's something even more important than that...
Every dog is unique. If I had a dog called Jake, they are Jake first, the breed second, and a dog third. The most important thing about Jake is that he's Jake. And that's where these "trainers" make their biggest mistake. In the case of Millan, he puts the emphasis on them being a "wolf" first.
It's not 'hipster', it's common sense and experience working with dogs. If you have a real problem with a dog - and we've worked with dogs who loathe humans - you can turn them around but it takes time and patience. And using dominance techniques will make things much much worse. Time and patience are things you don't have on a TV show where you need to look like a miracle worker.
I've seen clips of his show where he's pinning down a clearly terrified dog - but he's telling people this dog is aggressive or trying to be the pack leader. If you know what you're looking for, you can see his description of the problem and what is actually happening are often two different things.
They don't show the time a GSD attacked his owner because Millan was using a shock collar, for example.
To truly work through problems with a dog, they need to trust you and like you. Anyone can bully a dog for a short term shock effect. And with editing out what they don't want you to see on TV, it can look good. You have no idea what order everything is filmed in either.
On one show (not his) they showed a dog who had successfully overcome his obsession with eating the post when it arrived. However, all the work had been done by the owners before the TV behaviourist arrived (the wonders of TV), so they filmed the segment with the behaviourist going through the advice they would have given (as thought they were solving it) and filmed the dog not eating the post. Then, to round off the filming, they encouraged the dog to eat some post for the cameras - as a "before" shot, and buggered off. When edited together, it looked like this TV person had miraculously solved the problem in one visit, when actually the people found themselves back to square one - because the dog was obsessed with eating the post again.
As another quick example - some of these people use 'air sprays' to 'correct' a dog. We've seen dogs that because of these techniques, become terrified of air fresheners (or spray polish - or any spray at all) - and then those automatic air fresheners are randomly going off, and that sound is telling the dog off for whatever they're doing. You end up with a dog who is terrified of everything.
When you work with animals for weeks, months and sometimes years to get them right these programmes really do huge amounts of damage.
Hipster, indeed.
I bow to your greater experience and acknowledge my lesser, but I'd use these tricks again, as they worked for me and my dog.
http://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/61134/sarge/p1
The reason I responded so thoroughly to your post was your 'hipster' dig. Rather than enquire further, you thought you'd belittle the advice.
You may be using some of his kinder methods, but recommending his approach when he uses shock collars, prong collars, pinning, 'alpha' and 'dominance' techniques is a dangerous thing to do - so I thought I'd explain it fully so people can decide based on the differing techniques. And while there are gentle and more effective techniques there's no need for him at all.
http://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/61134/sarge/p1
Feedback