Well I've always had a random figure of around £1500 in my head that I'd never consider purchasing a guitar over this value. There's no set justification I guess it comes down to my current financial point and thinking beyond that value it's just not a justifiable amount to blow when family life needs to be funded. Also for 1500 the scope for the level of quality builds you could get your hands on in the used market in my opinion reaches a point where spending more just equals rarity rather than improved playability or craftsmanship.
The only way I would realistically consider spending more would be on a vintage piece such as a player grade 59/60 Les Paul Jnr or Jazzmaster that can still be had for not to extortionate prices but still above my moral price point. In this kind of purchase the knowledge that there could be scope for future investment and the obvious mojo that goes with it could sway my justification on the price.
The other day however I started looking again at an Echopark Downtowner. They're never going to win any beauty contests but there is something about them that just does something for me. The only issue is the pricetag attached. Sure they are one of the current companies where hand built actually means it and built from old growth select materials with a ridiculous waiting list, but the chances of these being an investment are probably slim. They have some big name users such as Joe Perry and Josh Homme but a used echopark owned by me will never attract a higher price tag!
For some strange reason I keep finding myself looking over the pictures on World Guitars of the limited edition Koa top version they have in their used section, but at nearly 4k it's just looking like it'll have to stay window shopping unless they can do a very very generous non profitable deal for them lol
The chances are it would be a keeper and the value therefore is irrelevant but when we're talking car quantity money on a guitar that is likely to not be a viable investment over the years, it just puts me off. It hasn't stopped me weighing up selling on a load of my current amps/guitars/pedals to replace it with this expensive piece of wood though! Bloody GAS!!!
So I guess the point of this thread is:
Irrespective of current bank balance/gear funds available does anyone else have a random self imposed figure they try to keep their guitar purchases to?
What is it that makes you select that price point and is there a specific item that would make you blow that total?
Comments
Damn that was a long post! Here's a pic of the offender in question to break up the waffling text:
I know it will be hated by most but that kind of makes it appeal even more
I would not pay more than that, although it's nice to know that something you use might retain or increase its value.
ie, I would never buy a vintage Fender for more than a CS Relic would cost. Which puts me out of the market, I know.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
But when playing guitar isn't my only source of income and purely just a hobby at the moment the thought of spending 4k on a luxurious item changes from pure fun and enjoyment of playing to worrying about the need to be able to cover a significant amount of the value if a family situation means I have to sell further down the line.
Without being a professional musician or a millionaire i guess I've set a price at which the resale is irrelevant and at which it's just purely about the playing. When that figure is 3 times that value though I doubt I'd be having 3 times the fun so I guess my thoughts turn to money tied up and likely depreciation.
That Downtowner was £5500 new - someone took a bath on it already. And if you've ever tried to sell a boutique build privately, you'll know just how f*cking hard it is to get anything fair for it.
I see so many like that traded into dealers after having been on the open market for a long time, it ends up being the only way to flip 'em easily, and you know the dealer isn't paying "retail."
The best you can realistically hope for is that you get a killer guitar to play the crap out of and leave as a lovely gift for your kids when you're gone.
Look at the market for vintage violins and other classical instruments. Stradivari and other highly renowned early makers' violins are worth hundreds of thousands or even millions, others are worth tens of thousands - probably not a lot more than they cost new in real terms, if at all.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Only two things are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
The most I'd spend on a Fender is what a decent partscaster would cost. So £600 ish? Possibly I would go to a 2nd hand CS guitar, but the ones I have tried wouldn't justify the additional cost, but they are better as an investment in that they don't depreciate. Gibson, I'd spend 3k on an early 60's ES330 If I had the money. Not so much an as an investment, I'd play it at every opportunity.
That adds up to flavour of the month / impossible to sell in 2 years to me. No way on earth I'd pay the asking for those. They have the whiff of clever marketing about them...like a manufactured band that 'appears from nowhere'. Could be wrong of course.
The only modern guitars I might take a punt on - at that price point - would be Gustavson, Michael Stevens or Teuffel (and even then only the Birdfish). They *might* break even longer term.
Having said all that, if the Echopark absolutely speaks to you it could be the best guitar value ever, regardless of price. As long as you don't want to sell it .
i bought a CS strat that was more than I'd consider strats to be worth because it was a great guitar and I didn't think I'd realistically find better anywhere regardless of budget.
so in a way I don't have arbitrary number in mind but if I had to sell, i wont take a big hit.
£1000 is probably the point where I start to think very hard about whether it's worth it or not. I realise that's because it's a very round figure, and that companies and marketing people realise that consumers tend to do that. :
Having said that, I'm also quite sure I wouldn't ever buy a CS Les Paul at 5k because the market quite clearly values them between 1800 and 3k depending on the exact model, and at some point I'll probably buy something in that range, whenever I stumble upon a black-top R7 or R8 that I can't resist.
electric proddy probe machine
My trading feedback thread
http://upstart.bizjournals.com/entrepreneurs/hot-shots/2012/07/23/echopark-guitar-entrepreneur-goes-solo.html?page=all
Quite a bit of backstory, actually. Worked with Leo Fender at G&L directly before he passed away (as well as George Fullerton).
This guy's not very different from Paul Reed Smith in the 80s... Make nice stuff, get a few guitars in the right hands and the rest follows. Except in this case, the market is way tougher, so the days of exponential growth are probably behind us, but if he can eke it out ok then good for him.
There will be many guys reading this thread who will find that GAS has cost them £10k or more, over (let's say) 10 or 15 years. Swopping guitars that are "just OK" and doing that often is expensive and arguably not very efficient.
In fact @usedtobe has just put it very well.