Hand up, who could actually solve the Rubiks Cube as a kid?

What's Hot
13»

Comments

  • olafgartenolafgarten Frets: 1648
    I learnt when I was 12, it's not difficult if you have nothing else to do. What I am surprised at is that my 12 year old self managed to work out how to solve the first 2 layers at the same time without using the Internet. 

    I'm not sure if I could still solve it but I don't see why not. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • SambostarSambostar Frets: 8745
    I did one side then I set fire to it so it melted and bubbled and was unusable after that.
    Backdoor Children Of The Sock
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • thermionicthermionic Frets: 9677
    FRockStar said:

    Anyone remember the snake? Wasn't by Rubik, I don't think, but was a foldable snake,  made up of triangular pieces, you could make into a ball, or make all kinds of animal and other shapes. 
    Yes, it was by Rubik. My sister had one, didn't do much. Difficult second album type of thing.
    2reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • sev112sev112 Frets: 2814
    Mr Sheen made a huge differnece

    we had a group of us at school who could do it under 10s, and none of us were brainy kids !  It's not a maths problem - it was collective wisdom working out new moves and then incorporating them

    speed comes from not looking at the cube, you only need to see 3 faces at most,often only 2 and sometimes only one, because there are actually very few places that the colour cell you want can be.  

    On each step, there are only 3 or 4 moves at most which are repeated.


    the faster solvers didn't do top then middle then bottom because that is not a symmetrical process and requires you to look for the bits you need, which takes time and thought


    faster technique was top corners, bottom corners, edges then centres
    using this technique the actual solves accelerates - you have a mess of all colours and then 4 moves later it all comes together.
    and the key behind that is that you are not moving one cell at a time- in moving one, you are necessarily moving another


    couldn't do much of one these days - red wine has dissolved the relevant brain cells 

    0reaction image LOL 1reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom
  • TonyRTonyR Frets: 908
    Yes I could do it back in the day and I can still do it now, doing it from time to time to keep my hand in. I even still have the same Rubik's cube!

    I had a discussion with a chap at work a few years ago who could also do it, he's far more analytical than I am and he'd worked out how to do it in as few moves as possible, consequently he was able to do it extremely quickly. Made me feel rather inferior...
    We are all Chameleons...
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • sev112 said:
    Mr Sheen made a huge differnece
    ...
    speed comes from not looking at the cube, you only need to see 3 faces at most,often only 2 and sometimes only one, because there are actually very few places that the colour cell you want can be.  
    ...
    fastertechnique was top corners, bottom corners, edges then centres
    using this technique the actual solves accelerates - you have a mess of all colours and then 4 moves later it all comes together.
    and the key behind that is that you are not moving one cell at a time- in moving one, you are necessarily moving another

    Wow, that's something to think about. I've always done;

    One side with the 1st slice, second slice, bottom cross, put the bottom corner in the right place, rotate bottom corners.

    Will think about changing the order and seeing where it goes.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • DiscoStuDiscoStu Frets: 5577
    I didn't know that it had an answer, given that the starting point could be different each time you pick it up.
    Which is why I've never understood how people can break records for solving it as each case must be different. To 'solve' it it must be a puzzle. If record attempts are based on a regulation starting point then all that people are doing is learning the sequence and then it's just a speed contest.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • Not as a kid, but I can do it now in about 2 minutes.
    Learnt after I saw my drunk mate do it in about 14 seconds.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • olafgartenolafgarten Frets: 1648
    DiscoStu said:
    I didn't know that it had an answer, given that the starting point could be different each time you pick it up.
    Which is why I've never understood how people can break records for solving it as each case must be different. To 'solve' it it must be a puzzle. If record attempts are based on a regulation starting point then all that people are doing is learning the sequence and then it's just a speed contest.

    There are certain sequences of turns that you need to do to move the pieces in a certain way, you just apply those in the right sequence as fast as possible. Professionals can basically work out what they need to do by only looking at the cube once.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • WezVWezV Frets: 16824
    Professionals?
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
  • RobDaviesRobDavies Frets: 3073
    Could do one side but never had the patience to learn how to complete it. 

    The snake was my thing..... snake to ball in sub seven seconds. :)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom
Sign In or Register to comment.