It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
The money raised could have done so much good for charity, but he decided to go for the publicity, which in itself is unlike anything a "true punk" would have done. Utter bellend.
But for now, twat.
He's a twerp. A self-publicising, self-aggrandising, "ooh, I'm an artist", "look-at-me-look-at-me", "my parents were famous so I must be cool" twerp.
Like father, like son. No real talent except for saying 'look at me'.
I'm sure one of the pioneers (Richard Branson) could have bought it all off him. 5 million would have been spare change to him, he could have displayed them somewhere pertinent and used the excellent idea above of buying guitars for schools.
If not it could have gone some way to providing for all the homeless people in London.
It's such a waste. 5 million quid just to inflate your ego. Fuck me. I hate the bloke.
I'm 23. I don't care. Burn that old crap because nobody should give a shit anymore. From the ashes, build something new for a change.
The "punk" (in it's modern definition, as opposed to "arsehole") thing to do would be to give it all away to a homeless shelter and illustrate how this repackaged nostalgia can be used to do something worthwhile.
Burning it just makes him a bag of dicks.
Then again our culture is nostalgia - smash the museums, burn the libraries, blow up those ancient cities.
Pol Pot, Mao, Daesh-Isis.
People who burn stuff for kicks are dicks for not giving the money to charity instead?
Hope you're not a smoker.
So because other people value it, he decides it has no value to him anymore? Punk always has been about what other people think.