How can i build a les paul prototype in 2017?
We all know the 1952 was a flawed les paul. What many might not know know is that some prototypes existed prior to this - at least one 1951 les paul. And Les was constantly modding the things gibson sent him.
This means there are a few pics of old les pauls that don't quite match what we would expect.
I was thinking of doing a 1952 style, but have decided I would rather be a bit different and take my influence from some of the earlier, odder versions.
At its core it will be like a les paul we know and love. I won't be replictaing flawed neck angles or unusal bridges. But it won't be another burst clone.
here are the various sources of inspiration, you may have seen them before:
probably the most famous - different tailpiece, dearmond pickup under a modded P-90 cover. top mounted jack, no neck binding, chickenhead knobs etc
similar, but different pickup, trem tailpiece, bound neck, different controls
a few variations on the theme
Here is one many will be less familiar with. No binding, florentine cutaway, dot markers, dog ear pickups, odd carve etc - as well as many mods around the switch, pickups and plate
or the same thing with a different tailpiece
this guitar also had a full width tenon ala juniors, PRS etc..
Comments
Still trying to decide whether i will bind the fretboard and use dots or traps.
it will have a bridge/long tailpiece set-up. I would like to try a couple of different floating bridges before i settle. It will be routed for P-90's. And i had a pickup maker point out he was working on some dearmond dynasonic style pickups so i think that is decided for the neck
Still not sure if it will be gold top, or a nice vintage tint natural - but no bursts here
Instagram
Looks like a wonderful project already, can't wait to see what you come up with. Personally I'd eschew the binding and go with a simple inlay on the fingerboard - maybe something else from the early Gibson golden years to stay "in the spirit of..." rather than aiming for a true copy?
Its definitely going to be an "in the spirit of" build. I leave the truly authentic copies to others.
I will get some pics of the wood up in the next few days.
Instagram
I am fairly sure most of the les paul owned ones will have been modded beyond recognition within minutes of any of the above pics.
If you look at the original Ad for a les paul, it's a fairly safe guess he was not playing a standard spec 52
Instagram
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/6-String-Archtop-Guitar-Trapeze-Tailpiece-Bridge-Chrome-Guitar-Parts/152347271908
Edit: I ordered one to see what it's like. If it's junk, I will find something else. It's too close to what I am after to ignore
Instagram
Love those early ones and I'm bored of bursts tbh
I do have my take on a modern one planned at some point, I think I read somewhere some of the early 52 ones were made with a Spanish cedar body which I'm keen to try
Anyway I'll be watching
(formerly customkits)
that 51 above is very reminiscent of the bigsby guitar, which was fully chambered. The Gibson also has a full back panel, article states it's to cover wiring channels, but it's also the kind of thing you would do if you realised your prototype was too heavy and wanted to add some chambers.
i am just convincing myself that a chambered version may still be in the spirit
Instagram
I made a semi chambered goldtop that came out really good tone wise and it's alot easier on the back, Its just a slightly different tone, it was 7.8lb fully built the body was 5.2lb with a full carved top
The mahogany back ended up about 4lb
Now get building so I can read something interesting, like your strat too btw
(formerly customkits)
I will definitely be weight relieving in some way even if its just the swiss approach. I'm just happier if I can justify it as being something that might have happened originally
I will likely do a laminated neck and a modern 2-way truss rod even though there is no possible way I can claim that's period correct
Hopefully the build will start this weekend
Instagram
Mahogany, sycamore and rosewood
I have not selected the neck wood yet - i have loads of neck blank sized mahogany to choose from
this is the lowest grade of rippled sycamore from timberline, its still probably more figured than i was after, but ya know, i think I will cope Its a lower grade because the figure gets significantly weaker near the edge, the flame isn't that deep and it has a bit of discolouration right on the edge.
its gonna look great covered in gold
Instagram
you get a fairly good look at the guitar a minute into this vid. note the plate has slipped, and in the vid above he seems to have added a couple of screws to the top edge
Instagram
Just got the body cut out
6lb , but still 48mm thick so it should loose nearly half a pound on the thicknesser
Instagram
The mahogany:
You may notice its quartersawn with some nice ribboning throughout. This is certainly not part of the traditional burst recipe and you may not think its right for a Les Paul. If you look through BOTB you will see almost all of the classic Gibsons have flatsawn backs - except one, which isn't a burst. serial number 8 3324. Its a gold top believed to be owned by Mary Ford
Its not as unusual to see quartersawn backs on the earlier models
The sycamore:
also quartersawn throughout. Obviously my choice of sycamore is a significant departure from the Gibson recipe. But its worth remembering that gibsons use of flamed maple was an emulation of old violins. The old violins will have been made from sycamore Its going to be slightly lighter and warmer than the gibson maple, but that should suit the brighter pickups
Instagram
Instagram