I've wanted a Les Paul Standard (Gibson!) for a long time and I've decided that I'm going save like a mofo and get one sometime next year. Part of it is because I love the look / tone, and part is because Les Paul!
However I currently play a PRS CU 24 SE and being honest I do love the PRS.
So when googling the subject there are many posts singing the McCartys praises and it's got me thinking that maybe that would be a better option. Now when I say McCarty I mean one of the normal ones, and not the 594 (I wish!) as it's probably going to take bit of a stretch of the budget to even get a used normal one!
Anyone any experience of the two and care to shed any light on the subject?
Comments
I much prefer the PRS models as they fit me better ergonomically and I think they sound better. YMMV vary of course.
Both played great and the coil taps where very useful.
They appear to me to be very different guitars.
Later models with 57/08s cure his. The most obvious other model is the DGT - which adds a trem, a slightly different neck carve and independent volume controls to the McCarty recipe - along with great-sounding stock pick-ups. Definitely in the Les Paul ballpark tonally but with vastly superior ergonomics.
Basically, if you want an LP, get one and hang on tight, its going to be a long ride.
View my feedback at www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/1201922
There are SE versions available, and should should closer to a LP.
Or one of the Bernie Marsden signatures. (Although different control layout.)
It was a more functional instrument to me, easier to play from ergodynamics and the coil taps made it more versatile. The Gibson smelt better though.
That might not be enough either. If you get a plaintop, and I've had two of them, then there is always that thing at the back of your mind that you would like an R9!
I know this from experience, which is why I bought the R9 in my avatar in the August frenzy rather than a plaintop R8.