It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
She had form as well, following the cartridge based fx that were actually a great idea but completely fell apart through sheer incompetence.
EDIT: I just googled - this was tweeted yesterday...
I've seen it work really well in situations that basically go:
- we've made an album (at our own expense...we're investing in this too, not just asking you to)
- we're raising funding to produce the physical product and do some promotion
- if you donate x (roughly the price of CD) we'll send you the CD when it's produced plus y (something like an exclusive download ... it doesn't have to be much because the donor is already getting something roughly commensurate with their donation)
- or you can donate at these higher levels in which case you'll get z (some other stuff)
It's effectively a pre-order process that helps the artist mitigate the risk of production and promotion expense - previously done by record labels, but a lot for individuals to take on. Unless we just want trustafarians making records, this seems reasonable and not at all piss-takey.
I can't help about the shape I'm in, I can't sing I ain't pretty and my legs are thin
But don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to
And, if so, I wonder if there might be not one but two "winners" in this little appeal...
But it seems to me that to ask for public contributions to buy what purports to be a valuable vintage guitar without having it professionally and openly appraised beforehand is, at best, highly stupid and irresponsible (and at worst - which I'm not saying, by the way - it would be very suspect indeed).
tl;dr: I don't trust young Dave to know the diff between a genuine '62 and a wheelbarrow.
A football podcast that I used to love did a podcast April 2016 and didn't do their next one until a year later, during that time they asked on Twitter how much would people be prepared to pay for a new episode.......in the end their 'new' episode in April 2017 was free.
"Monetising" it is tough, but apparently even Andertons make decent ad revenue, Chappers makes "buy a new overpriced guitar every week" money, there is money in ads for sure.
It's no different to the guys who made great software for free having a donate button - it's completely optional - if you are loyal to a person online because you love their content or their personality then you may very well feel you have enough money in your pocket to "help them out" or feel like you are giving them something for the enjoyment they bring you.
If people are willing to pay - let them - if they want to give him their money so he can have a guitar - it's up to them. It still makes me feel a bit uncomfortable watching someone ask but I'm not going to judge as he's not scamming or persuading money from people - they are doing it as they like him and what he does.
People will pay a fair price for a good product.
Agreed, the Netflix model is great, I dip in and dip out of the monthly payment usually depending upon whether House of Cards has a news series - but you never feel like you're being taken for a ride.
Thing is though, YouTube is more than a little different - watching someone dick around with a few guitars is one thing if it's free but none of the guitar related content we are talking about is of the quality that justifies payment IMO.
Massively depends on what you're watching. And the point is pay to remove ads, not put the content behind a paywall.
Might not be your cup of tea but the kind of videos guys like Ola Englund, Keith Merrow etc have put together require a lot of skill and work. IIRC Keith Merrow has put up to a week into some individual YT videos if I'm remembering his URM Academy interview properly.
Not just that, think of the amount of knowledge that gets passed through YT. I managed to fix the toilet the other month by watching YT videos and nipping down to Screw Fix to get some parts. Just one example.
I think Music creators get the bum end of the deal with monetising YT. Gamers can play as many games as they fancy, there are loads. Generally music creators need to also write and perform the music too, this tends to slow down output. If you look at some of the full time gamer types they're outputting videos almost daily, that'd be super tough in music. In music there is some scope for brand tie ins but musicians are a cynical bunch and don't buy in to that the same way some other groups of people are ok with it.
As for the paid version YouTube Red ... (not RedTube!) is the one, there's also regular premium content apparently...
But it's much easier to install Adblock Plus
Its not available in the U.K.
I refuse to run an ad blocker as I think it's unfair on content creators.