It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Don't talk politics and don't throw stones. Your royal highnesses.
There are credibility issues like the bombers in space - where the bombs had forgotten that they need gravity to drop to the target and the sister found herself in a bomb bay with doors open to vacuum yet didn't die there and then.
The credibility issue doesn't and shouldn't apply to anything "Force-related" because that is one of the major premises of the whole series - we suspend disbelief so the Force can drive the narrative and plots. But bombers?...
This film displayed a lack of new ideas and much recycling of old ones. If you hadn't seen any others (unlikely for most of us) then maybe you didn't mind yet another one-to-one showdown finale duel, or the "out of the blue" appearance at just the right time, (again) of the Falcon, or the casino scenes that looked just like a polished version of the scuzzy bar from the first film, or a dark ex-Jedi remotely strangling a colleague to establish dominance.
I thought the best acting came from Mark Hamill and Andy Serkis. Most of the characters were dreadfully stereotyped and the actors performed accordingly - doing it well, but a bit one-dimensional. Adam Driver was a hit and miss - very believable when in conflict with himself and not so much when totally in control of things. I think my problem is I loved his performance in Paterson and this wasn't it.
But... none of this stopped me from enjoying the film at the time, despite the holes. Well shot, great CGI and you don't have to think too hard - in fact, that is a disadvantage...
Agreed, bombs in space was silly, but we've long since established that in the SW universe it's possible to have openings in to space with some sort of shielding that maintains gravity and atmosphere while allowing objects to pass through.
Don't talk politics and don't throw stones. Your royal highnesses.
Don't talk politics and don't throw stones. Your royal highnesses.
I had a discussion with a mate last night who's a proper Star Wars nerd. I was expecting him to be gushing about how good it was, like most of the reviews were. However, he was devastated! Said it had 'ruined' Star Wars for him, started going on about how it should have all fitted in the wider Jedi universe and how it missed the mark, and going on about all the plot holes, inconsistencies in character development, lack of philosophical weight blah blah blah...
I just told him to get a grip - he's a 40 year old bloke watching what is essentially a kid's film, don't take it so bloody seriously!
Don't talk politics and don't throw stones. Your royal highnesses.
If Rian Johnson found that canon annoying, he could have asked to direct Spaceballs 2 instead.
It's only a movie...
I have spent the past 18 months reading Star Wars books. not all of them, there are just too many, but i started with at the old republic and am now at the stage of Lukes Jedi academy. That guy is totally right about it being safe and predictable. The main characters are pretty much untouchable and undeveloped from the George Lucas vision
.
Instagram
the cartoons are still the best tie ins. Clone wars had brief moments of greatness. Rebels more so.
Instagram
I heard a lot of that was cut to reduce length of film, but will be included on blueray